QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
vs
SAP CPQCloud configure-price-quote software from SAP.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Qwilr vs SAP CPQ
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 28.3 versus 0 for SAP CPQ.
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.3 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or PCI-DSS coverage
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
Choose SAP CPQ if…
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Qwilr | SAP CPQ |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 28.3% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #4 | #54 |
| Share of voice | 7.2% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 37 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 51% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Qwilr 0pp · SAP CPQ 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
QwilrSAP CPQ
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Qwilr ranked higher
0SAP CPQ ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Qwilr | SAP CPQ |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $35 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Web-based, web-native software | Cloud, offered as software-as-a-service, moved to Microsoft Azure data centers as of release 2308 |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS | — |
| Support | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions | — |
| Founded | 2014 | — |
| Headquarters | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia | Walldorf, Germany |
| Employees | 51–200 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised | — |
| Best for | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. | — |
Plans side by side
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
SAP CPQ
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
SAP CPQ
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Qwilr vs SAP CPQ”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/qwilr-vs-sap-cpq, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.