QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
vs
SignWellBusiness-grade eSignatures without the enterprise overhead.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Qwilr vs SignWell
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 28.3 versus 0 for SignWell.
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.3 vs 0)
- You need PCI-DSS coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
- Interactive, web-based proposals
Choose SignWell if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need HIPAA (BAA on paid plans) or GDPR or eIDAS or ESIGN Act or UETA or NOM-151 (via SeguriData partnership) coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Qwilr | SignWell |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 28.3% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #4 | #55 |
| Share of voice | 7.2% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 37 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 51% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Qwilr 0pp · SignWell 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
QwilrSignWell
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Qwilr ranked higher
0SignWell ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Qwilr | SignWell |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $35 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Web-based, web-native software | — |
| Integrations | — | 9000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS | SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA (BAA on paid plans), GDPR, eIDAS, ESIGN Act, UETA, NOM-151 (via SeguriData partnership) |
| Support | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions | Support from real people on every plan, Dedicated support on the Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2014 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia | Portland, Oregon, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised | Pre-Seed (TinySeed) |
| Best for | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. | Growing businesses and API-driven platforms that want compliant eSignatures without enterprise overhead. |
Plans side by side
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
SignWell
Free$0month
Light$10month, billed yearly ($12 billed monthly); includes 1 sender
Business$30month, billed yearly ($36 billed monthly); includes 3 senders
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
SignWell
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Qwilr vs SignWell”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/qwilr-vs-signwell, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.