QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
vs
SirionThe global leader in AI-native, enterprise-grade contract lifecycle management software.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Qwilr vs Sirion
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 28.3 versus 2.5 for Sirion, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.3 vs 2.5)
- AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 0% positive)
- You need PCI-DSS coverage
- Interactive, web-based proposals
Choose Sirion if…
- You need ISO 27001:2022 or SOC 1 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- AI-native agentic contract automation
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Qwilr | Sirion |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 28.3% | 2.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #4 | #24 |
| Share of voice | 7.2% | 1% |
| Mentions this run | 37 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 51% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Qwilr 0pp · Sirion 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
QwilrSirion
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
2Qwilr ranked higher
0Sirion ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Qwilr | Sirion |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Proposals & Contracts tools in 2026? | AI Mode | #2 | #8 |
| Official website of the top proposal and contract tool vendors | ChatGPT | #3 | #14 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Qwilr | Sirion |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $35 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Web-based, web-native software | Cloud-based SaaS platform |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS | ISO 27001:2022, SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions | — |
| Founded | 2014 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia | Lehi, Utah, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised | Series C |
| Best for | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. | — |
Plans side by side
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Sirion
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Sirion
- AI-native agentic contract automation
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Qwilr vs Sirion”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/qwilr-vs-sirion, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.