RasaBuild agents your company brags about
vs
Tray.aiOrchestrate integration, automation, and agents
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Rasa vs Tray.ai
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Rasa is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 2.4 versus 1.5 for Tray.ai.
Choose Rasa if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.4 vs 1.5)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose Tray.ai if…
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or HIPAA or GDPR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Recommended as a cloud-neutral orchestration platform option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Rasa | Tray.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.4% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #36 | #50 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Rasa 0pp · Tray.ai 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Rasa leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
RasaTray.ai
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Rasa ranked higher
0Tray.ai ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Rasa | Tray.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Self-managed on-premises or private cloud, or managed service | Tray-managed cloud runtime, with on-premise connectivity and regional hosting on Enterprise plans |
| Integrations | — | 700+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 1, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR |
| Support | Free community support in the forum, Basic support via online portal with best-effort response during business hours, Premium Support with 24/7/365 response, Customer Success Manager and business reviews | Business hours support on all plans, Knowledge base, Community forums, Tray Academy |
| Founded | 2016 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series C · $70M raised | Series C-2 · $164M raised |
| Best for | Product teams in regulated enterprises that want engineers and business teams to build customer-facing AI agents on one codebase | Enterprise IT and business teams that need to build integrations, AI agents and governed MCP tools on one platform |
Plans side by side
Tray.ai
ProCustomSized to your needs
TeamCustomSized to your needs
EnterpriseCustomSized to your needs
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Rasa
Profile in progress.
Tray.ai
- Recommended as a cloud-neutral orchestration platform option
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Rasa vs Tray.ai”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/rasa-vs-tray-ai, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.