RecruiterflowAI-native ATS and CRM for executive search, recruiting and staffing agencies
vs
TestGorillaFind great talent. Prove they can do the job.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Recruiterflow vs TestGorilla
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Recruiterflow is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 3.1 versus 0.6 for TestGorilla.
Choose Recruiterflow if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.1 vs 0.6)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 1 or ISO 27001 or GDPR coverage
- Attractive for recruitment agencies and staffing teams
Choose TestGorilla if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need GDPR compliant or SOC 2 Type II compliant coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- automated sending of tests and automatic score return
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Recruiterflow | TestGorilla |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.1% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #30 | #59 |
| Share of voice | 0.7% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Recruiterflow 0pp · TestGorilla 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Recruiterflow leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
RecruiterflowTestGorilla
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Recruiterflow ranked higher
0TestGorilla ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Recruiterflow | TestGorilla |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $149 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $74 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | SaaS | — |
| Integrations | 30+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 1, ISO 27001, GDPR | GDPR compliant, SOC 2 Type II compliant |
| Support | SLA-backed support, Dedicated implementation, Live chat with a rep, FAQ and help articles | Help center, 24/7 live chat, Email support, Digital onboarding guides |
| Founded | 2017 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Series A · $80M raised |
| Best for | Retained, contingent and executive search firms and recruiting and staffing agencies that want AI tools alongside a full ATS and CRM | Small companies with limited hiring needs (Core plan) and larger teams screening candidates at scale (Plus plan). |
Plans side by side
Recruiterflow
Platform Plan$149per user / month
AIRA PlanCustomcustom pricing (contact sales)
TestGorilla
Gorilla Sourcing Free$0month
Gorilla Sourcing Core$74per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Sourcing Plus$134per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Assessments Free$0month
Gorilla Assessments Core$215per account per month, billed annually (from)
Gorilla Assessments Plus$520per account per month, billed annually (from)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Recruiterflow
- Attractive for recruitment agencies and staffing teams
- Priced at $119/user/month billed annually
TestGorilla
- automated sending of tests and automatic score return
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Recruiterflow vs TestGorilla”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/recruiterflow-vs-testgorilla, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.