Skip to content
SlateIndex
RipplingHR, IT, and Finance apps on a unified data platform
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Rippling vs Workable

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 8.1 for Rippling, and ranks ahead in 71% of the answers that name both.

Choose Rippling if…

  • You need more native integrations (600+ vs 270+)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (55% vs 44% positive)
  • You need SOC 1 Type II or CSA STAR Level 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27018 or ISO 42001 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)

Choose Workable if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 8.1)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 coverage
  • fast deployment and ease of use
  • intuitive automation and candidate tracking

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Rippling Workable
Visibility score8.1%30.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#14#2
Share of voice2.2%7.2%
Mentions this run1038
Positive in AI answers55%44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Rippling 8%

Rippling 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
34.1%
AI Mode
19.3%
29.4%
Perplexity
5%
26.7%
RipplingWorkable

Head to head in AI answers

7 engine answers name both brands

2Rippling ranked higher
5Workable ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionRipplingWorkable
Pricing model—Flat tiers
Entry price—$299 / mo
Free plan—No · 15-day trial
DeploymentCloudCloud-based SaaS
Integrations600+270+
ComplianceSOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, CSA STAR Level 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27018, ISO 42001ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3
SupportContact page, AI assistantPriority support on Premier and Enterprise plans
Founded20162012
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CA, United StatesBoston, Massachusetts, USA
Employees5,000+201–500
FundingSeries G · $1850M raisedSeries C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised
Best forCompanies wanting identity, device and access management tied directly to HR and payroll dataCompanies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.

Plans side by side

Rippling

Pricing not available.

Workable

Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Workable pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Rippling

  • Unified HR, IT, and payroll in one automated system
  • Strong user ratings from reviewers and analysts
  • Recruiting tightly integrated with HR and payroll
  • Ease of use and intuitive interface
  • Expense management connected to HR and payroll
  • Mandatory annual contracts with undisclosed discounts
  • Custom quotes make pricing hard to compare

Workable

  • fast deployment and ease of use
  • intuitive automation and candidate tracking
  • transparent pricing and free trial
  • all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
  • candidate sourcing
  • costs more than lightweight ATS options

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Rippling vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/rippling-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.