SeekOutThe agentic AI recruiting platform that runs on your terms
vs
SourceWhaleThe AI recruitment platform that captures everything, automatically.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
SeekOut vs SourceWhale
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
SeekOut is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 5.3 versus 0.3 for SourceWhale.
Choose SeekOut if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.3 vs 0.3)
- You need ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 23894:2023 coverage
- Free trial with unlimited AI-powered profile searches
- Strong for sourcing passive talent
Choose SourceWhale if…
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 coverage
- Strong multi-channel candidate engagement via email and LinkedIn automation
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | SeekOut | SourceWhale |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.3% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #18 | #62 |
| Share of voice | 1.9% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
SeekOut 0pp · SourceWhale 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
SeekOut leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
SeekOutSourceWhale
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0SeekOut ranked higher
0SourceWhale ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | SeekOut | SourceWhale |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $149 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, hosted on Microsoft Azure | Cloud-hosted |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 23894:2023 | GDPR, CCPA, ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | Help center and trainings, Dedicated customer success on higher plans, Dedicated integration and onboarding, White-glove implementation on the full plan | — |
| Founded | 2017 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Bellevue, WA, United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series C · $189M raised | Round led by Blackfinch Ventures, with Downing Ventures participating (reported as £1.5m, undated) |
| Best for | Solo sourcers and teams starting with dedicated recruiting seats, up to enterprises running the full recruiting funnel | Recruitment, staffing and executive search firms that want to replace several separate recruiting tools with one platform. |
Plans side by side
SeekOut
SeekOut Sourcing Core (Recruit Core)$149per seat per month, billed annually; $179/mo billed monthly
SeekOut Sourcing (Recruit)Customper seat, custom, billed annually
SeekOut Sourcing + Integration (Recruit)Customcustom packages by team size, billed annually
SeekOut Full Recruiting Funnel (Recruit)Customcustom, billed annually
SourceWhale
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
SeekOut
- Free trial with unlimited AI-powered profile searches
- Strong for sourcing passive talent
- Per-recruiter cost may be high relative to alternatives
SourceWhale
- Strong multi-channel candidate engagement via email and LinkedIn automation
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “SeekOut vs SourceWhale”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/seekout-vs-sourcewhale, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.