SeekOutThe agentic AI recruiting platform that runs on your terms
vs
ZipRecruiterOnline employment marketplace connecting employers and job seekers
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
SeekOut vs ZipRecruiter
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
SeekOut is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 5.3 versus 3.2 for ZipRecruiter.
Choose SeekOut if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.3 vs 3.2)
- AI answers describe it more positively (25% vs 20% positive)
- You need GDPR or CCPA or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 23894:2023 coverage
- Free trial with unlimited AI-powered profile searches
Choose ZipRecruiter if…
- AI matching pushes job postings to over 100 job sites at once
- One-click posting and pulling applicants back in
- Publishes jobs and captures applicants across multiple channels
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | SeekOut | ZipRecruiter |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.3% | 3.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #18 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 1.9% | 1% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | 20% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
SeekOut 0pp · ZipRecruiter 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
SeekOut leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
SeekOutZipRecruiter
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0SeekOut ranked higher
0ZipRecruiter ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | SeekOut | ZipRecruiter |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $149 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, hosted on Microsoft Azure | Cloud-based |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 23894:2023 | SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | Help center and trainings, Dedicated customer success on higher plans, Dedicated integration and onboarding, White-glove implementation on the full plan | — |
| Founded | 2017 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Bellevue, WA, United States | Santa Monica, California |
| Employees | 51–200 | — |
| Funding | Series C · $189M raised | Senior notes offering (debt, not equity) · $219M raised |
| Best for | Solo sourcers and teams starting with dedicated recruiting seats, up to enterprises running the full recruiting funnel | Employers that want a high volume of applicants quickly |
Plans side by side
SeekOut
SeekOut Sourcing Core (Recruit Core)$149per seat per month, billed annually; $179/mo billed monthly
SeekOut Sourcing (Recruit)Customper seat, custom, billed annually
SeekOut Sourcing + Integration (Recruit)Customcustom packages by team size, billed annually
SeekOut Full Recruiting Funnel (Recruit)Customcustom, billed annually
ZipRecruiter
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
SeekOut
- Free trial with unlimited AI-powered profile searches
- Strong for sourcing passive talent
- Per-recruiter cost may be high relative to alternatives
ZipRecruiter
- AI matching pushes job postings to over 100 job sites at once
- One-click posting and pulling applicants back in
- Publishes jobs and captures applicants across multiple channels
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “SeekOut vs ZipRecruiter”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/seekout-vs-ziprecruiter, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.