Sourcegraph CodyThe enterprise coding assistant to understand, fix, and automate your code
vs
ZedThe world's fastest IDE. Open source. AI optional.
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Sourcegraph Cody vs Zed
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Sourcegraph Cody is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 7.7 versus 1 for Zed.
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.7 vs 1)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
Choose Zed if…
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 0% positive)
- Ideal for small teams already on GitHub
- Works with VS Code and JetBrains
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Sourcegraph Cody | Zed |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 7.7% | 1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #12 | #26 |
| Share of voice | 3.3% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 16 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Sourcegraph Cody 0pp · Zed 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Sourcegraph Cody leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Sourcegraph CodyZed
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Sourcegraph Cody ranked higher
0Zed ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Sourcegraph Cody | Zed |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $16,000 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Single-tenant cloud, self-hosted, or bring-your-own cloud for air-gapped environments | Desktop editor on Windows, macOS and Linux, with remote development over SSH, WSL and dev containers. Users can run local Ollama models, and API keys for hosted providers are kept on the local machine. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 | — |
| Support | 24×5 support, Customer success manager, Optional premium support | — |
| Founded | — | 2021 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, US | Boulder, Colorado |
| Employees | 51–200 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Later-stage deal · $225M raised | Series B · $42M raised |
| Best for | Enterprise engineering teams working on large, complex codebases | Developers who want a fast editor with AI optional, and teams that need org-level control over AI features and data sharing through the Business plan. |
Plans side by side
Sourcegraph Cody
Enterprise$16,000year, minimum annual contract (starting at)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Sourcegraph Cody
- Free trial available for 30 days
- Pricing lacks transparency for small teams due to reliance on custom sales quotes
Zed
- Ideal for small teams already on GitHub
- Works with VS Code and JetBrains
- Heavy usage requires a paid plan upgrade
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Sourcegraph Cody vs Zed”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/sourcegraph-cody-vs-zed, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.