Tray.aiOrchestrate integration, automation, and agents
vs
UiPathBusiness orchestration and automation for AI agents, robots, and people
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Tray.ai vs UiPath
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
UiPath is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 3.5 versus 1.5 for Tray.ai.
Choose Tray.ai if…
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or GDPR coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Recommended as a cloud-neutral orchestration platform option
Choose UiPath if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.5 vs 1.5)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or C5 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Tray.ai | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.5% | 3.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #50 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 1.3% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 9 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Tray.ai 0pp · UiPath 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
UiPath leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Tray.aiUiPath
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Tray.ai ranked higher
0UiPath ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Tray.ai | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | No · 30-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Tray-managed cloud runtime, with on-premise connectivity and regional hosting on Enterprise plans | Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped |
| Integrations | 700+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5 |
| Support | Business hours support on all plans, Knowledge base, Community forums, Tray Academy | Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum |
| Founded | 2012 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series C-2 · $164M raised | IPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised |
| Best for | Enterprise IT and business teams that need to build integrations, AI agents and governed MCP tools on one platform | Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform |
Plans side by side
Tray.ai
ProCustomSized to your needs
TeamCustomSized to your needs
EnterpriseCustomSized to your needs
UiPath
Community$0free forever
Basic$25per month (starting at)
StandardCustomcontact sales
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Tray.ai
- Recommended as a cloud-neutral orchestration platform option
UiPath
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
- Rated Exemplary by ISG
- Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
- Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Tray.ai vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/tray-ai-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.