WorkOSYour app, Enterprise Ready.
vs
ZITADELIdentity infrastructure, simplified for you.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
WorkOS vs ZITADEL
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
WorkOS is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 9.5 versus 1.3 for ZITADEL.
Choose WorkOS if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (9.5 vs 1.3)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR or CCPA or SOC 3 or SIG Lite coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
- Highly transparent for B2B SaaS authentication
Choose ZITADEL if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (83% vs 56% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Free cloud tier with core features like MFA and OIDC
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | WorkOS | ZITADEL |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 9.5% | 1.3% |
| Change vs last week | down−1.3% | up+0.5% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #11 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 3% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 10 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 56% | 83% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
WorkOS +0.5999999999999996pp · ZITADEL −1.8pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
WorkOS leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
WorkOSZITADEL
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0WorkOS ranked higher
0ZITADEL ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | WorkOS | ZITADEL |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Free; paid from $100 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud APIs and SDKs | Cloud and self-hosted |
| Integrations | 20+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, SOC 3, SIG Lite | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Email support, In-dashboard web support, Slack channel, Video calls | Discord community, GitHub, Documentation, Technical Account Manager (Enterprise) |
| Founded | 2019 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Seed · $195M raised | Series A · $16M raised |
| Best for | SaaS and AI companies that need to add enterprise features like SSO and SCIM to sell to large organizations. | Developers building applications that need authentication for consumers, businesses or employees, including multi-tenant B2B apps. |
Plans side by side
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
WorkOS
- Highly transparent for B2B SaaS authentication
- Best overall choice for typical B2B SaaS authentication
- Purpose-built for B2B SaaS to quickly unlock enterprise contracts
- Generous free tier and usage-based pricing
- Rapid enterprise feature integration (SSO, SCIM, provisioning)
- Advanced enterprise SAML connections may incur extra costs
ZITADEL
- Free cloud tier with core features like MFA and OIDC
- Cloud-native, open-source IAM with strong multi-tenancy and audit logging
- Clear usage limits and published monthly pricing
- Good for developer-focused IAM
- Cloud-based IAM without managing infrastructure
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “WorkOS vs ZITADEL”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/workos-vs-zitadel, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.