Index
Book a demo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM Alternatives and Competitors

#12 in Applicant Tracking System

by Bullhorn · bullhorn.com ↗

Recruiting and staffing software combining applicant tracking with CRM workflows.

#12Applicant Tracking SystemMid-market
Visit website ↗

Why buyers look elsewhere

Bullhorn is a strong fit for staffing and recruiting teams that want their ATS and CRM to work together instead of living in separate tools. The supplied documents present Bullhorn as recruitment software built for agencies of different sizes, with automation, candidate management, reporting, onboarding, and broader back-office support all tied into the same platform. That makes it especially relevant for buyers who are trying to reduce admin work, keep candidate and client information in one place, and give recruiters a more connected workflow.

That said, alternatives still matter because not every team is buying for the same reason. Some buyers are comparing a staffing-specific platform against a more standard ATS, while others want to benchmark workflow design, scalability, or pricing structure before they request a quote. The alternatives listed here are limited to competitors that appear in the provided documents or measured co-mentions, and the comparison points focus only on what the supplied sources actually support.

Bullhorn is built for recruitment and staffing teams that want an integrated ATS and CRM, but some buyers still need to compare how other platforms handle workflow depth, automation, and day-to-day usability for their specific team size. If your current process is already centralized, you may be looking for a different balance of simplicity, customization, or implementation style.
The documents also show that pricing for Bullhorn is available only by quote, so teams that want to benchmark costs side by side will likely want to review alternatives before committing. In practice, the best fit often comes down to whether you need a staffing-specific platform with CRM depth or a lighter ATS with a different feature mix.

Top alternatives

5 products

Greenhouse

Teams that want a widely recognized ATS benchmark to compare against Bullhorn’s staffing-focused CRM and workflow model.

Greenhouse appears in the measured context as the top-ranked ATS peer, which makes it a natural option for buyers doing a short list comparison. It is worth considering if your priority is evaluating a best-known ATS against Bullhorn’s recruitment-and-client management approach.

No pricing details were provided for Greenhouse in the supplied documents, while Bullhorn’s pricing is listed as available by quote.

Lever

Recruiting teams comparing modern ATS workflows and candidate management approaches.

Lever is another high-visibility ATS peer in the measured context, so it belongs on any serious alternatives page for Bullhorn. Buyers may compare it to Bullhorn when they want to understand differences in workflow design and how each system supports recruiting operations.

No pricing details were provided for Lever in the supplied documents, while Bullhorn’s pricing is listed as available by quote.

Workable

Teams that want to compare Bullhorn with a popular ATS option that is frequently mentioned in the same buying conversations.

Workable shows up in the ranked peer context and in the co-mention data, which indicates meaningful buyer overlap with Bullhorn. It is a sensible alternative to review if you are comparing how different ATS platforms support sourcing, screening, and hiring workflows.

No pricing details were provided for Workable in the supplied documents, while Bullhorn’s pricing is listed as available by quote.

Workday Recruiting

Larger organizations that want to evaluate an enterprise recruiting system alongside Bullhorn’s staffing-specific platform.

Workday Recruiting appears in the measured context and is part of the peer set buyers often evaluate when comparing applicant tracking systems. It may be relevant if your team is focused on enterprise hiring processes and wants to contrast that model with Bullhorn’s agency-oriented ATS and CRM.

No pricing details were provided for Workday Recruiting in the supplied documents, while Bullhorn’s pricing is listed as available by quote.

SmartRecruiters

Organizations comparing Bullhorn with another ATS that is visible in the same market conversations.

SmartRecruiters is included in the measured peer context and co-mention data, so it is a legitimate alternative to include on a Bullhorn comparison page. Buyers may review it when they want to compare how different platforms organize candidate management and recruiting workflows.

No pricing details were provided for SmartRecruiters in the supplied documents, while Bullhorn’s pricing is listed as available by quote.

Comparison matrix

DimensionBullhorn ATS & CRMThe alternatives
Core product focusBullhorn is positioned as recruitment and staffing software that combines ATS and CRM workflows in one platform. The supplied documents emphasize that it is purpose-built for agencies and built to connect candidate and client activity.The alternatives named in the source set are all ATS peers, but the documents do not provide equivalent product positioning details for each one. Buyers should compare whether an alternative is a general ATS or whether it offers the same staffing-specific CRM depth as Bullhorn.
Workflow depthBullhorn’s materials stress an end-to-end recruiting workflow that includes ATS, CRM, automation, onboarding, back office, and marketplace connectivity. That makes it a strong fit for teams that want more than basic candidate tracking.The supplied documents do not describe each alternative’s full workflow depth, so the key comparison point is whether a competitor matches Bullhorn’s broader operational scope or stays closer to standard ATS functionality.
PricingBullhorn’s pricing is not published on the supplied product profile and is described as available upon request.Because the documents do not provide pricing for the named alternatives, the practical comparison is how much implementation and operational value each platform delivers relative to a quote-based purchase process.
Scale and fitBullhorn says it serves small agencies, midsize firms, and enterprise recruitment teams, and its site also states it is trusted by 80% of the world’s largest agencies.The source set does not provide parallel scale claims for each competitor, so buyers should check whether an alternative is best suited for small teams, midmarket hiring, or enterprise recruiting.

How to choose

Choose Bullhorn if your team wants an ATS that is tightly connected to CRM workflows and broader staffing operations. The supplied documents repeatedly frame Bullhorn as a recruitment-first platform with automation, onboarding, and back-office depth, so it is a strong option when you want a single system for client and candidate work.

Look more closely at alternatives if your buying process is driven by a need to compare user experience, implementation style, or a different ATS philosophy. The available documents support Bullhorn’s strengths clearly, but they do not give enough detail about each competitor to recommend one over another on feature specifics alone.

↓Next: Reviews