Skip to content
SlateIndex

Cursor reviews

New

AI Coding Agent for Building Ambitious Software

AI Coding Assistants501–1,000 employees

Visibility score
67.7%
New vs last week
Weekly run · Nov 3

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Reviews · what AI answers and open sources say

Cursor reviews: what AI answers say

Positive in AI answers
53%
of 70 engine answers that mention Cursor
Sentiment of answers
Positive53%
Neutral37%
Mixed10%

What answers praise

  • Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing · 4 answers
  • High user satisfaction and momentum · 2 answers
  • Top overall pick for professional developers · 4 answers
  • Transparent pricing tiers and annual discount · 3 answers
  • Free tier to try it · 2 answers

Common criticisms

  • Shared credit pool makes heavy agentic usage less predictable · 1 answers
  • Free Hobby plan has limited usage · 1 answers

Open sources these answers cite

SourceTypeCitations
github.comWeb46
amazon.comWeb22
superblocks.comWeb22
openai.comWeb14
anthropic.comWeb13
gartner.comAnalyst12
dupple.comWeb11
g2.comReview site11
zapier.comWeb10
dev.toWeb8

Classified from 70 engine answers across 11 prompts in the last four weekly runs.SlateIndex does not collect review-site ratings and never shows invented quotes.

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Cursor AI visibility profile”, https://slateindex.ai/brand/cursor, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.