100HiresAI Recruiting Software for Small Business
vs
hireEZEnterprise Hiring, Run by Agents. Recruiters Decide.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
100Hires vs hireEZ
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
hireEZ is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 2.5 versus 2 for 100Hires.
Choose 100Hires if…
- You want a lower entry price ($49 vs $494)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Intuitive, AI-forward ATS well suited to startups and small-to-medium teams
- Affordable and easy to use for small and midsize teams
Choose hireEZ if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.5 vs 2)
- AI answers describe it more positively (29% vs 25% positive)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | 100Hires | hireEZ |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2% | 2.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #38 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 1.1% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | 29% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
100Hires 0pp · hireEZ 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
hireEZ leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
100HireshireEZ
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0100Hires ranked higher
0hireEZ ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | 100Hires | hireEZ |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $49 / mo | $494 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No · 7-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted, with servers in the US and Europe | Layered on top of the customer's existing ATS with no rip-and-replace, deployed in weeks. |
| Integrations | — | 40+ |
| Support | Email support, Chat support, Online knowledge base, Video tutorials | — |
| Founded | 2019 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | San Diego, California, United States | Mountain View, California, US |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Seed | Series C |
| Best for | Small businesses and startups that hire through job boards and inbound applicants | Enterprise talent acquisition teams that want agentic AI added to their existing ATS, as well as individual recruiters starting out. |
Plans side by side
100Hires
Start$49per month, billed annually
Advanced$199per month, billed annually
Pro$399per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
100Hires
- Intuitive, AI-forward ATS well suited to startups and small-to-medium teams
- Affordable and easy to use for small and midsize teams
- Strong overall reviews with high rating and large review base
hireEZ
- AI-powered outbound sourcing
- cross-platform talent mapping
- diversity hiring support
- AI-assisted sourcing capabilities
- per-recruiter cost may be high relative to alternatives
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “100Hires vs hireEZ”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/100hires-vs-hireez, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.