Skip to content
SlateIndex

100Hires alternatives

New

AI Recruiting Software for Small Business

RecruitingSan Diego, California, United States11–50 employeesFounded 2019

Visibility score
2%
New vs last week
Weekly run · Nov 3

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Alternatives · updated Nov 3, 2026

100Hires alternatives: top competitors compared

100Hires has a visibility score of 2 in Recruiting, #38 of 83. AI answers that name 100Hires most often also name these 4.

Quick reference

AlternativeBest forStarting priceVisibilityKey differentiator
GreenhouseEmployers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprisesContact sales38.5%Connects employers and job seekers in one hiring ecosystem, so sourcing, interviewing and the ATS share the same signal
LinkedInRecruiters and hiring teams who need to source professional candidates—19.1%Size of the candidate database is cited as the main differentiator
IndeedSmall to large companies hiring—13.7%—
ZohoBusinesses of all sizes, from startups to enterprises, wanting one suite for sales, support, finance and HR—44.8%A broad suite of 60+ in-house products on a technology stack and data centers Zoho owns, with no ad-based revenue

Greenhouse suits employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises.

Quick facts

  • Contact sales · flat tiers
  • 38.5% visibility score · #1 in Recruiting

Key features

  • Greenhouse Sourcing — Surfaces job seekers from MyGreenhouse and prospect pools when a role opens.
  • Greenhouse Real Talent — Flags fraud, spam and misrepresentation, verifies candidates and ranks best-fit applicants.
  • Greenhouse Voice AI — Two-way, voice-based first interview on the candidate's schedule, using the team's own questions and rubric.
  • Greenhouse Notetaker — Records, transcribes and summarizes interviews and maps notes to scorecard questions.

Greenhouse vs 100Hires

DimensionGreenhouse100Hires
Visibility score38.5%2%
Pricing modelFlat tiersFlat tiers
Entry priceContact sales$49 / mo
Free planNoNo
Trial—14-day free trial

Pros

  • Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
  • Strong reporting and data visibility
  • Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
  • Integration ecosystem and unified data
  • Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance

Cons

    Full Greenhouse vs 100Hires comparison

    LinkedIn suits recruiters and hiring teams who need to source professional candidates.

    Quick facts

    • Pricing not available
    • 19.1% visibility score · #5 in Recruiting

    Key features

    • LinkedIn Recruiter — Candidate sourcing and pipeline tool with advanced filters, Boolean search and recommended matches.
    • LinkedIn Recruiter Lite — Lower-volume tier with 30 InMail messages per month and more than 20 filters.

    LinkedIn vs 100Hires

    DimensionLinkedIn100Hires
    Visibility score19.1%2%
    Pricing model—Flat tiers
    Entry price—$49 / mo
    Free plan—No
    Trial—14-day free trial

    Pros

    • Industry-standard candidate sourcing and networking reach
    • Chrome extension imports candidates directly from LinkedIn
    • One-click job posting to LinkedIn and other boards

    Cons

    • Basic LinkedIn integration and permission settings can feel restrictive
    • Integrations may not work seamlessly in practice
    Full LinkedIn vs 100Hires comparison

    Indeed suits small to large companies hiring.

    Quick facts

    • Pricing not available
    • 13.7% visibility score · #12 in Recruiting

    Key features

    • Indeed for Employers — Cloud-based hiring platform with candidate-stage tracking, dashboards, assessments and ATS integrations.
    • Talent Scout — AI agent for employers.
    • Premium Sponsored Jobs — Pay-per-click sponsored job postings with daily or total spend limits.
    • Indeed Connect — Subscription bundle with early access to tools such as Advanced Sourcing and Smart Screening.

    Indeed vs 100Hires

    DimensionIndeed100Hires
    Visibility score13.7%2%
    Pricing model—Flat tiers
    Entry price—$49 / mo
    Free plan—No
    Trial—14-day free trial

    Pros

    • Largest global job site with broad reach
    • Free or sponsored job postings
    • Free built-in ATS dashboard for direct postings
    • Multi-board job distribution and applicant pull-in
    • Chrome extension to import candidates

    Cons

      Full Indeed vs 100Hires comparison

      Zoho suits businesses of all sizes, from startups to enterprises, wanting one suite for sales, support, finance and HR.

      Quick facts

      • Pricing not available
      • 44.8% visibility score · #3 in CRM

      Key features

      • Zoho CRM — Manage sales, marketing and support in one CRM platform.
      • Zoho Desk — Customer service software for support teams.
      • Zoho Creator — Low-code platform to build custom business apps.
      • Zoho One — Unified suite of 50+ business applications.

      Zoho vs 100Hires

      DimensionZoho100Hires
      Visibility score44.8%2%
      Pricing model—Flat tiers
      Entry price—$49 / mo
      Free plan—No
      Trial—14-day free trial

      Pros

      • Strong value for money and low cost
      • Free tier for small teams
      • Broad functionality and integrated app ecosystem
      • Good customization options
      • Scales well as businesses grow

      Cons

      • Less premium user experience
      • Pricing varies dramatically across products
      Full Zoho vs 100Hires comparison

      How to choose

      Match the pricing model to your cost driver: headcount, usage or features.

      PlatformPricing modelStarting price
      100HiresFlat tiers$49 / mo
      GreenhouseFlat tiersContact sales
      LinkedIn——
      Indeed——
      Zoho——

      More alternatives

      Ranked by how often AI answers name them alongside 100Hires in the latest weekly run.

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “100Hires AI visibility profile”, https://slateindex.ai/brand/100hires, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.