100HiresAI Recruiting Software for Small Business
vs
GreenhouseThe Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem for the AI era
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
100Hires vs Greenhouse
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 2 for 100Hires, and ranks ahead in 33% of the answers that name both.
Choose 100Hires if…
- Intuitive, AI-forward ATS well suited to startups and small-to-medium teams
- Affordable and easy to use for small and midsize teams
- Strong overall reviews with high rating and large review base
Choose Greenhouse if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 2)
- AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 25% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or GDPR or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | 100Hires | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2% | 38.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #38 | #1 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 8.1% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 43 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | 56% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
100Hires 0pp · Greenhouse 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
100HiresGreenhouse
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
2100Hires ranked higher
1Greenhouse ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | 100Hires | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which recruiting platform has the best reviews? | Perplexity | #1 | #5 |
| Alternatives to the most popular recruiting platform | Perplexity | #14 | #9 |
| Who makes the most used recruiting platform? | Perplexity | #6 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | 100Hires | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $49 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted, with servers in the US and Europe | — |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSS |
| Support | Email support, Chat support, Online knowledge base, Video tutorials | — |
| Founded | 2019 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Diego, California, United States | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Seed | Series D · $110M raised |
| Best for | Small businesses and startups that hire through job boards and inbound applicants | Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises |
Plans side by side
100Hires
Start$49per month, billed annually
Advanced$199per month, billed annually
Pro$399per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
100Hires
- Intuitive, AI-forward ATS well suited to startups and small-to-medium teams
- Affordable and easy to use for small and midsize teams
- Strong overall reviews with high rating and large review base
Greenhouse
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
- Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
- Integration ecosystem and unified data
- Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “100Hires vs Greenhouse”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/100hires-vs-greenhouse, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.