100HiresAI Recruiting Software for Small Business
vs
JuiceboxThe AI Recruiting Platform that learns how you search, so you source better talent, faster.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
100Hires vs Juicebox
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
100Hires is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 2 versus 2 for Juicebox.
Choose 100Hires if…
- You want a lower entry price ($49 vs $99)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Intuitive, AI-forward ATS well suited to startups and small-to-medium teams
- Affordable and easy to use for small and midsize teams
Choose Juicebox if…
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 25% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | 100Hires | Juicebox |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2% | 2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #38 | #39 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | 67% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
100Hires 0pp · Juicebox 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
100Hires leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
100HiresJuicebox
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0100Hires ranked higher
0Juicebox ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | 100Hires | Juicebox |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $49 / mo | Free; paid from $99 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted, with servers in the US and Europe | — |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR |
| Support | Email support, Chat support, Online knowledge base, Video tutorials | Knowledge base, Help center, Chat and email support, Priority support (email, chat, Slack) with 24-hour response times on the Business plan |
| Founded | 2019 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Diego, California, United States | San Francisco, California |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Seed | Seed · $116M raised |
| Best for | Small businesses and startups that hire through job boards and inbound applicants | Recruiters and talent teams searching for hard-to-find talent, from startups and enterprises to recruiting agencies. |
Plans side by side
100Hires
Start$49per month, billed annually
Advanced$199per month, billed annually
Pro$399per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Juicebox
Free$0per seat/month
Starter$99per seat/month
Growth$179per seat/month
BusinessCustomcustom, annual only
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
100Hires
- Intuitive, AI-forward ATS well suited to startups and small-to-medium teams
- Affordable and easy to use for small and midsize teams
- Strong overall reviews with high rating and large review base
Juicebox
- quick online setup
- free starting option
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “100Hires vs Juicebox”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/100hires-vs-juicebox, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.