100HiresAI Recruiting Software for Small Business
vs
LoxoThe AI recruiting platform for scaling firms
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
100Hires vs Loxo
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
100Hires is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 2 versus 1.9 for Loxo.
Choose 100Hires if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2 vs 1.9)
- You want a lower entry price ($49 vs $149)
- AI answers describe it more positively (25% vs 17% positive)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Loxo if…
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- 7-day free trial
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | 100Hires | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #38 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | 17% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
100Hires 0pp · Loxo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
100Hires leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
100HiresLoxo
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0100Hires ranked higher
0Loxo ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | 100Hires | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $49 / mo | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No · 7-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted, with servers in the US and Europe | — |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Support | Email support, Chat support, Online knowledge base, Video tutorials | Dedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below that |
| Founded | 2019 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Diego, California, United States | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Seed | Growth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raised |
| Best for | Small businesses and startups that hire through job boards and inbound applicants | Scaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teams |
Plans side by side
100Hires
Start$49per month, billed annually
Advanced$199per month, billed annually
Pro$399per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Loxo
Core$149per user / month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustombilled annually, contact sales for pricing
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual agreement
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
100Hires
- Intuitive, AI-forward ATS well suited to startups and small-to-medium teams
- Affordable and easy to use for small and midsize teams
- Strong overall reviews with high rating and large review base
Loxo
- 7-day free trial
- High per-user pricing
- Annual-only plans paid upfront
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “100Hires vs Loxo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/100hires-vs-loxo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.