100HiresAI Recruiting Software for Small Business
vs
RecruiterflowAI-native ATS and CRM for executive search, recruiting and staffing agencies
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
100Hires vs Recruiterflow
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Recruiterflow is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 3.1 versus 2 for 100Hires.
Choose 100Hires if…
- You want a lower entry price ($49 vs $149)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Intuitive, AI-forward ATS well suited to startups and small-to-medium teams
- Affordable and easy to use for small and midsize teams
Choose Recruiterflow if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.1 vs 2)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 25% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 1 or ISO 27001 or GDPR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | 100Hires | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2% | 3.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #38 | #30 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
100Hires 0pp · Recruiterflow 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Recruiterflow leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
100HiresRecruiterflow
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0100Hires ranked higher
0Recruiterflow ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | 100Hires | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $49 / mo | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted, with servers in the US and Europe | SaaS |
| Integrations | — | 30+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 1, ISO 27001, GDPR |
| Support | Email support, Chat support, Online knowledge base, Video tutorials | SLA-backed support, Dedicated implementation, Live chat with a rep, FAQ and help articles |
| Founded | 2019 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Diego, California, United States | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Seed | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | Small businesses and startups that hire through job boards and inbound applicants | Retained, contingent and executive search firms and recruiting and staffing agencies that want AI tools alongside a full ATS and CRM |
Plans side by side
100Hires
Start$49per month, billed annually
Advanced$199per month, billed annually
Pro$399per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Recruiterflow
Platform Plan$149per user / month
AIRA PlanCustomcustom pricing (contact sales)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
100Hires
- Intuitive, AI-forward ATS well suited to startups and small-to-medium teams
- Affordable and easy to use for small and midsize teams
- Strong overall reviews with high rating and large review base
Recruiterflow
- Attractive for recruitment agencies and staffing teams
- Priced at $119/user/month billed annually
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “100Hires vs Recruiterflow”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/100hires-vs-recruiterflow, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.