ActivepiecesAI agents, flows and 770+ apps in one workspace, open source at the core
vs
HubSpotThe agentic customer platform to scale your business.
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2
Activepieces vs HubSpot
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
HubSpot is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 73.1 versus 0 for Activepieces.
Choose Activepieces if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose HubSpot if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (73.1 vs 0)
- You want a lower entry price ($7 vs $20)
- You need more native integrations (2000+ vs 770+)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Activepieces | HubSpot |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 73.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Marketing Automation | #40 | #1 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 13.1% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 72 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 35% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Activepieces 0pp · HubSpot 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
HubSpot leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ActivepiecesHubSpot
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Activepieces ranked higher
0HubSpot ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Activepieces | HubSpot |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $20 / mo | Free; paid from $7 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Onboarding fee | — | $3,000 |
| Deployment | Vendor cloud (EU, Frankfurt by default), self-hosted on your own servers, or fully air-gapped | Cloud |
| Integrations | 770+ | 2000+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | Community, AI support, Email on Team plan, Dedicated support on Ultimate plan | Phone |
| Founded | 2022 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, US | Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Seed | Corporate round |
| Best for | Teams that want AI agents and automations across their business apps, with IT running the deployment and staff building the workflows | Startups, small and mid-sized businesses and enterprises wanting marketing, sales and service on one CRM. |
Plans side by side
HubSpot
Free$0month
Starter$7month per seat (promotional, new customers; $20/mo/seat standard)
Professional$800month, includes 3 Core Seats (annual commitment; $890/mo)
Enterprise$3,600month, includes 5 Core Seats
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Activepieces
Profile in progress.
HubSpot
- intuitive, user-friendly interface
- generous free tier
- all-in-one CRM and marketing platform
- tight CRM integration for live chat and service
- good fit for startups and small businesses
- higher-tier costs and onboarding fees
- higher month-to-month pricing than annual plans
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Activepieces vs HubSpot”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/activepieces-vs-hubspot, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.