AgentCorePlatform for building, deploying, and operating AI agents at scale
vs
ClayBuild systems to grow revenue
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
AgentCore vs Clay
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
AgentCore is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 6.2 versus 0.7 for Clay.
Choose AgentCore if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.2 vs 0.7)
- You need HIPAA eligible or FedRAMP (Class C and D) or SOC 2 or CSA STAR or ISO certifications coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- infrastructure-level security
Choose Clay if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 30% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | AgentCore | Clay |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 6.2% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #20 | #65 |
| Share of voice | 1.5% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 30% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AgentCore 0pp · Clay 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
AgentCore leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AgentCoreClay
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0AgentCore ranked higher
0Clay ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AgentCore | Clay |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $167 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud service on AWS; Runtime instances can also run agents on the customer's own EC2 instances | — |
| Compliance | HIPAA eligible, FedRAMP (Class C and D), SOC 2, CSA STAR, ISO certifications | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | — | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan |
| Founded | — | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, Washington | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | — | Series B Expansion |
| Best for | — | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. |
Plans side by side
AgentCore
Pricing not available.
Clay
Free$0month
Launch$167month (starting price as shown; monthly from $185 per FAQ)
Growth$446month (starting price as shown; monthly from $495 per FAQ)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, annual commitment
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AgentCore
- infrastructure-level security
- scalable, feature-rich cloud infrastructure
- one of the world's largest cloud platforms
- developer-centric, requires custom workflow work
- complexity and pricing need careful management
- requires a capable engineering team
Clay
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AgentCore vs Clay”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/agentcore-vs-clay, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.