Clay vs Salesloft
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Salesloft is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 51.2 versus 2.9 for Clay, and ranks ahead in 86% of the answers that name both.
Choose Clay if…
- You need GDPR or CCPA coverage
Choose Salesloft if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (51.2 vs 2.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (34% vs 33% positive)
- You need ISO 27701 coverage
- Enterprise-grade cadence management and revenue orchestration
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clay | Salesloft |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.9% | 51.2% |
| Change vs last week | down−1.5% | up+1.4% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #25 | #3 |
| Share of voice | 1.2% | 10.1% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 61 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 34% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clay −1.5000000000000004pp · Salesloft +1.4000000000000057pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Salesloft leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
7 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Clay | Salesloft |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a sales engagement platform for a mid-market team? | Perplexity | #7 | #6 |
| What should a sales engagement platform integrate with? | ChatGPT | #9 | #13 |
| Best sales engagement platform for startups | ChatGPT | #8 | #6 |
| Best sales engagement platform for startups | Perplexity | #8 | #6 |
| Best sales engagement platform for enterprise | Perplexity | #8 | #2 |
| Best sales engagement platform with AI features | ChatGPT | #11 | #2 |
| Which sales engagement platform offers a free trial? | Perplexity | #13 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clay | Salesloft |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $167 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | — | Cloud (XaaS-only) |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701 |
| Support | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan | — |
| Founded | 2017 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | Atlanta, GA |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | — |
| Funding | Series B Expansion | Series F · $246M raised |
| Best for | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. | — |
Plans side by side
Clay
Salesloft
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clay
Profile in progress.
Salesloft
- Enterprise-grade cadence management and revenue orchestration
- Deep revenue intelligence and forecasting via Clari integration
- Widely recognized top enterprise choice and gold standard
- Strong pipeline visibility and coaching for rep productivity
- Sales execution with structured sequencing
- Pricing not publicly listed; requires sales quote
- Requires annual contracts and minimum seats
- Expensive, overly complex, and slow to configure for startups
- No free plan or self-service free trial
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs Salesloft”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-salesloft, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.