Agiloft vs Icertis
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Agiloft is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 3.4 versus 3.3 for Icertis, and ranks ahead in 25% of the answers that name both.
Choose Agiloft if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.4 vs 3.3)
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 coverage
- Highly customizable, adaptable contract lifecycle management
- Deep customizability and agile workflow configurations
Choose Icertis if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (40% vs 36% positive)
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or FedRAMP or NIST 800-171 Rev. 2 or TISAX or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or GDPR or ITAR or Microsoft SSPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Agiloft | Icertis |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.4% | 3.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #22 | #23 |
| Share of voice | 1.5% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 8 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 36% | 40% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Agiloft 0pp · Icertis 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Agiloft leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Agiloft | Icertis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading Proposals & Contracts platforms | ChatGPT | #8 | #9 |
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #5 | #1 |
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | AI Mode | #3 | #2 |
| Official website of the top proposal and contract tool vendors | ChatGPT | #10 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Agiloft | Icertis |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Hosted service on AWS, with redundant infrastructure inside or outside the USA | Public or private cloud |
| Integrations | 1000+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701 | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, FedRAMP, NIST 800-171 Rev. 2, TISAX, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, GDPR, ITAR, Microsoft SSPA |
| Support | Professional Services and Training, Technical Support, Customer Success, Agiloft University | — |
| Founded | 1991 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, California, US | Bellevue, WA, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Strategic investment, KKR | Round from existing backer B Capital, reportedly to pay down debt |
| Best for | Enterprise legal, procurement and sales teams that need to tailor contract workflows without code | Large global enterprises that manage high volumes of complex contracts |
Plans side by side
Icertis
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Agiloft
- Highly customizable, adaptable contract lifecycle management
- Deep customizability and agile workflow configurations
- Strong fit for mid-market and enterprise complex approval, compliance, and renewal needs
Icertis
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
- Handles complex commercial management
- Named as a prominent contract lifecycle management option
- Suited to large multinational enterprises
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Agiloft vs Icertis”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/agiloft-vs-icertis, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.