AgiloftAI-powered contract lifecycle management software
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Agiloft vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 28.3 versus 3.4 for Agiloft, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Agiloft if…
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Highly customizable, adaptable contract lifecycle management
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.3 vs 3.4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 36% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or PCI-DSS coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Agiloft | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.4% | 28.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #22 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 1.5% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 8 | 37 |
| Positive in AI answers | 36% | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Agiloft 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AgiloftQwilr
Head to head in AI answers
5 engine answers name both brands
0Agiloft ranked higher
5Qwilr ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Agiloft | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Proposals & Contracts tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #11 | #3 |
| Top proposal and contract tool options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #9 | #3 |
| Top proposal and contract tool options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #9 | #3 |
| Compare the leading Proposals & Contracts platforms | ChatGPT | #8 | #3 |
| Official website of the top proposal and contract tool vendors | ChatGPT | #10 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Agiloft | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Hosted service on AWS, with redundant infrastructure inside or outside the USA | Web-based, web-native software |
| Integrations | 1000+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701 | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | Professional Services and Training, Technical Support, Customer Success, Agiloft University | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | 1991 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, California, US | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Strategic investment, KKR | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | Enterprise legal, procurement and sales teams that need to tailor contract workflows without code | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Agiloft
- Highly customizable, adaptable contract lifecycle management
- Deep customizability and agile workflow configurations
- Strong fit for mid-market and enterprise complex approval, compliance, and renewal needs
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Agiloft vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/agiloft-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.