AgnoThe agent platform that builds itself
vs
ClayBuild systems to grow revenue
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Agno vs Clay
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Clay is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 0.7 versus 0 for Agno.
Choose Agno if…
- You want a lower entry price ($150 vs $167)
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 33% positive)
- You need SOC 2 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose Clay if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.7 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Agno | Clay |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #73 | #65 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Agno 0pp · Clay 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Clay leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AgnoClay
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Agno ranked higher
0Clay ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Agno | Clay |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $150 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $167 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Self-hosted in your own cloud, on-premise or locally, as a container | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | Community and forums, Email support, Slack Connect and service SLA (Enterprise) | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan |
| Founded | — | 2017 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Seed | Series B Expansion |
| Best for | Teams building and running agents in their own cloud, from solo builders to Fortune 5 companies | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. |
Plans side by side
Clay
Free$0month
Launch$167month (starting price as shown; monthly from $185 per FAQ)
Growth$446month (starting price as shown; monthly from $495 per FAQ)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, annual commitment
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Agno
- free open-source runtime
- no per-event, token, or compute charges
Clay
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Agno vs Clay”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/agno-vs-clay, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.