AhrefsMake your business discoverable, in search, AI, and beyond.
vs
GlassboxAI-powered customer intelligence insights for proactive, preventive and secure digital customer experiences.
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2
Ahrefs vs Glassbox
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Glassbox is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 4.4 versus 1.7 for Ahrefs.
Choose Ahrefs if…
- Strong backlink analysis and index
- Strong competitor research
- Honest, transparent pricing
- Deep technical site audits
Choose Glassbox if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.4 vs 1.7)
- AI answers describe it more positively (83% vs 49% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27017 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CSA STAR Level 1 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Ahrefs | Glassbox |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.7% | 4.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Web Analytics | #27 | #17 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 1.2% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 49% | 83% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Ahrefs 0pp · Glassbox 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Glassbox leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AhrefsGlassbox
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Ahrefs ranked higher
0Glassbox ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Ahrefs | Glassbox |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $29 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | SaaS | Single-tenant cloud on AWS or Microsoft Azure, and multi-tenant cloud. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CSA STAR Level 1 |
| Support | Customer support five days a week, Academy courses and certification, Webinars and AMAs, YouTube tutorials | — |
| Founded | 2010 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Singapore | London, United Kingdom |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Minority investment from Poalim Equity · $70M raised |
| Best for | Freelance SEOs, marketing consultants, and lean in-house marketing teams, from small businesses to Fortune 500 teams. | Highly regulated enterprises, such as financial services organisations, that need digital experience analytics with security and compliance. |
Plans side by side
Ahrefs
Ahrefs Free$0month
Starter$29month
Lite$129month
Standard$249month
Advanced$449month
Enterprise$1,499month, annual commitment required
Glassbox
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Ahrefs
- Strong backlink analysis and index
- Strong competitor research
- Honest, transparent pricing
- Deep technical site audits
- Free Webmaster Tools tier for verified site owners
- High monthly cost, especially for smaller budgets
- Seat-based pricing needs careful evaluation against team size
Glassbox
- Strong enterprise performer blending quantitative analytics with qualitative context
- Analysts frequently recommend it for combining event data with session replays
- Exceptionally high user ratings, around 4.8 to 4.9 out of 5 on G2
- Deep customer journey mapping and session playback
- Highest review rating among established web analytics tools
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ahrefs vs Glassbox”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ahrefs-vs-glassbox, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.