AirtableAI-Native App Platform
vs
Claris FileMakerBuild custom apps, automate work, and integrate systems
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Airtable vs Claris FileMaker
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Airtable is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 10.9 versus 1.6 for Claris FileMaker.
Choose Airtable if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.9 vs 1.6)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27701 or HIPAA or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
- User-friendly spreadsheet-database hybrid for no-code work
Choose Claris FileMaker if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Airtable | Claris FileMaker |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 10.9% | 1.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−1.5% | New |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #10 | #37 |
| Share of voice | 3.2% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 18 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 24% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Airtable −1.5pp · Claris FileMaker +1.6pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Airtable leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AirtableClaris FileMaker
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Airtable ranked higher
0Claris FileMaker ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Airtable | Claris FileMaker |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $20 per seat / mo | $22 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud, with US and EU hosting options | Cloud (FileMaker Cloud on AWS) or self-hosted (FileMaker Server) |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27701, SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, TX-RAMP Level 2 | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018 |
| Support | — | Technical support from Claris teams, Around-the-clock monitoring by Claris teams, Claris Academy certifications, Online community forums |
| Founded | 2012 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | — | Sunnyvale, California |
| Employees | — | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series F · $1350M raised | Later Stage VC · $1M raised |
| Best for | Teams and enterprises that need to build governed, AI-enabled business apps and workflows without writing code. | Teams that want custom business apps built without writing code, from small businesses to large enterprises |
Plans side by side
Airtable
Free$0user/month
Team$20user/month, billed annually
Business$45user/month, billed annually
Enterprise ScaleCustomcustom
Claris FileMaker
Starter (Formerly Essentials)$22per user, per month, billed annually
Max (Formerly Standard)$45per user, per month, billed annually
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Airtable
- User-friendly spreadsheet-database hybrid for no-code work
- Collaborative operational data and lightweight workflows
- Customizable workflows for project management
- Connects well with many data sources
- Annual billing lowers per-seat cost
Claris FileMaker
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Airtable vs Claris FileMaker”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/airtable-vs-claris-filemaker, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.