AiSDRAI SDR for deeply researched sales outreach
vs
CloseThe CRM that does the work
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3
AiSDR vs Close
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Close is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 2.8 versus 0 for AiSDR.
Choose AiSDR if…
- You want a lower entry price ($1.5 vs $19)
- You need SOC 2 (Type 1 completed July 29, 2025; Type 2 report on request) or EU-US Data Privacy Framework or ICO registration coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Close if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.8 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | AiSDR | Close |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 2.8% |
| Change vs last week | no change0% | down−0.6% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #45 | #26 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 1% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 52% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AiSDR 0pp · Close −0.5pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Close leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AiSDRClose
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0AiSDR ranked higher
0Close ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AiSDR | Close |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | $1.5 / mo | $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | SaaS | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 (Type 1 completed July 29, 2025; Type 2 report on request), GDPR, CCPA, EU-US Data Privacy Framework, ICO registration | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | GTM engineer support via Slack and email, Dedicated GTM engineer for team plans, Training and support for teams | Knowledge base, Email support |
| Founded | 2023 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | Austin, Texas, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Seed · $3M raised | Angel |
| Best for | Sales and revenue teams, marketing teams and startups that want outbound run by AI and measured by booked meetings | Founders, small businesses and sales teams that sell through calls, email and SMS |
Plans side by side
Close
Solo$19per user / month (billed monthly; $9 billed annually)
Essentials$49per user / month (billed monthly; $35 billed annually)
Growth$109per user / month (billed monthly; $99 billed annually)
Scale$149per user / month (billed monthly; $139 billed annually)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AiSDR
Profile in progress.
Close
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
- All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
- Strong customer satisfaction in recent reviews
- Frequently included in CRM shortlists
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AiSDR vs Close”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/aisdr-vs-close, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.