Close vs Pipedrive
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Pipedrive is the stronger AI pick in CRM: it has a visibility score of 34.2 versus 7.3 for Close, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Close if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (52% vs 44% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or CCPA coverage
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
Choose Pipedrive if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (34.2 vs 7.3)
- You need more native integrations (500+ vs 100+)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27701 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 or EU-US DPF coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Close | Pipedrive |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 7.3% | 34.2% |
| Change vs last week | down−1% | up+2.7% |
| Rank in CRM | #10 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 2.3% | 9.4% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 42 |
| Positive in AI answers | 52% | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Close −0.8999999999999995pp · Pipedrive +2.700000000000003pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Pipedrive leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
9 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Close | Pipedrive |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best CRM tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #9 | #4 |
| Top CRM options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #5 | #4 |
| Top CRM options for B2B SaaS companies | AI Mode | #4 | #3 |
| Top CRM options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #4 | #3 |
| Best CRM for startups | ChatGPT | #5 | #3 |
| Best CRM for startups | AI Mode | #4 | #3 |
| Which CRM has transparent pricing? | Perplexity | #4 | #2 |
| Which CRM tools offer annual discounts? | ChatGPT | #5 | #2 |
| Which CRM tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #7 | #1 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Close | Pipedrive |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $19 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | 100+ | 500+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27701, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, GDPR, EU-US DPF |
| Support | Knowledge base, Email support | Knowledge Base, Academy, Contact sales |
| Founded | 2013 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, United States | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Angel | Majority buyout (Vista Equity Partners) |
| Best for | Founders, small businesses and sales teams that sell through calls, email and SMS | Small and medium-sized sales teams wanting an easy-to-use, visual pipeline CRM |
Plans side by side
Close
Pipedrive
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Close
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
- All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
- Strong customer satisfaction in recent reviews
- Frequently included in CRM shortlists
Pipedrive
- Visual sales pipeline management
- Easy to use with quick setup
- Built specifically for sales teams
- Free trial with no credit card required
- Annual billing savings and clear pricing
- May lack governance, service, and advanced reporting
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Close vs Pipedrive”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/close-vs-pipedrive, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.