AmazingHiring vs Textio
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
AmazingHiring is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 0.3 versus 0.3 for Textio.
Choose AmazingHiring if…
No clear advantage in the published data.
Choose Textio if…
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
- Inclusive job language
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | AmazingHiring | Textio |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #66 | #64 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AmazingHiring 0pp · Textio 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
AmazingHiring leads on 1 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AmazingHiring | Textio |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Web, Android and iPhone/iPad | Cloud |
| Compliance | — | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | — | 1:1 support from the Textio Customer Success team, Textio Support Center, Textio U certification training |
| Founded | 2013 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, California | Seattle, Washington, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Angel | Unattributed VC round |
| Best for | Tech recruiters and talent acquisition teams filling hard-to-hire technical roles | High-growth companies that want to recruit and give managers feedback with AI guidance |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AmazingHiring
Profile in progress.
Textio
- Inclusive job language
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AmazingHiring vs Textio”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/amazinghiring-vs-textio, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.