Greenhouse vs Textio
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 0.3 for Textio, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Greenhouse if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 0.3)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or GDPR or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
Choose Textio if…
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Inclusive job language
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Greenhouse | Textio |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 38.5% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #1 | #64 |
| Share of voice | 8.1% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 43 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 56% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Greenhouse 0pp · Textio 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Greenhouse | Textio |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best recruiting tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #1 | #21 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Greenhouse | Textio |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | — | Cloud |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSS | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | — | 1:1 support from the Textio Customer Success team, Textio Support Center, Textio U certification training |
| Founded | 2012 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | Seattle, Washington, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series D · $110M raised | Unattributed VC round |
| Best for | Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises | High-growth companies that want to recruit and give managers feedback with AI guidance |
Plans side by side
Textio
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Greenhouse
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
- Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
- Integration ecosystem and unified data
- Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance
Textio
- Inclusive job language
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Greenhouse vs Textio”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/greenhouse-vs-textio, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.