TextioAI for Recruiting and Performance Management
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Textio vs Workable
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 0.3 for Textio, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Textio if…
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 coverage
- Inclusive job language
Choose Workable if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 0.3)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- fast deployment and ease of use
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Textio | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 30.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #64 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Textio 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
TextioWorkable
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Textio ranked higher
1Workable ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Textio | Workable |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best recruiting tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #21 | #6 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Textio | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 15-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | — | 270+ |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type II | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | 1:1 support from the Textio Customer Success team, Textio Support Center, Textio U certification training | Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2014 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, Washington, United States | Boston, Massachusetts, USA |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Unattributed VC round | Series C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised |
| Best for | High-growth companies that want to recruit and give managers feedback with AI guidance | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. |
Plans side by side
Textio
Pricing not available.
Workable
Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Textio
- Inclusive job language
Workable
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Textio vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/textio-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.