ApolloThe AI GTM System for Go-to-Market Teams
vs
MoosendGo from unread to subscribed. And from manual to automated.
Comparison · Email Marketing · weekly run Nov 2
Apollo vs Moosend
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Moosend is the stronger AI pick in Email Marketing: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 0.4 for Apollo.
Choose Apollo if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need more native integrations (200+ vs 80+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (60% vs 57% positive)
- You need GDPR or SOC 2 or CCPA or ISO/IEC 27001 or CASA Tier 2 or CPRA or EU-US DPF or PCI DSS coverage
Choose Moosend if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 0.4)
- You need ISO 27001 or M3AAWG or Certified Senders Alliance coverage
- Attractive annual pricing
- 30-day free trial
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Apollo | Moosend |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.4% | 3.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Email Marketing | #40 | #20 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 1.1% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 60% | 57% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Apollo 0pp · Moosend 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Moosend leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ApolloMoosend
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Apollo ranked higher
0Moosend ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Apollo | Moosend |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud platform | Cloud, hosted on Amazon Web Services in the EU |
| Integrations | 200+ | 80+ |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2, CCPA, ISO/IEC 27001, CASA Tier 2, CPRA, EU-US DPF, PCI DSS | ISO 27001, M3AAWG, Certified Senders Alliance |
| Support | Email support at support@apollo.io, Dedicated support on Custom plans, Sales team for Custom plan discussions | Knowledge base, 24/5 email support, 24/5 live chat support |
| Founded | 2015 | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Waltham, Massachusetts, U.S. (parent Constant Contact) |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | — |
| Funding | Series D · $250M raised | — |
| Best for | Sales and go-to-market teams that run prospecting, outreach and dialing and want data, AI and execution in one system | Agencies, publishers, ecommerce, SaaS and non-profit organisations that want email marketing and automation |
Plans side by side
Moosend
ProCustommonth, priced by contact count
Moosend+Customcustom quote
EnterpriseCustomcustom quote
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Apollo
- Large B2B contact database combined with prospecting and email sequencing
- Transparent self-serve per-user pricing with a free tier
- Strong all-in-one value for prospecting and outreach
- Affordable, reliable choice for small teams and startups
- Widely used and highly rated by reviewers
Moosend
- Attractive annual pricing
- 30-day free trial
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Apollo vs Moosend”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/apollo-vs-moosend, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.