Apollo vs Outreach
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Outreach is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 55.1 versus 51 for Apollo, and ranks ahead in 67% of the answers that name both.
Choose Apollo if…
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (60% vs 28% positive)
- You need GDPR or SOC 2 or CCPA or ISO/IEC 27001 or CASA Tier 2 or CPRA or EU-US DPF or PCI DSS coverage
- Large B2B contact database combined with prospecting and email sequencing
Choose Outreach if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (55.1 vs 51)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or HIPAA or CSA STAR coverage
- Enterprise-grade, mature task-driven sequencing platform
- Deep workflow controls and granular sequence analytics
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Apollo | Outreach |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 51% | 55.1% |
| Change vs last week | down−2.8% | down−20.3% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #4 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 9.4% | 10.1% |
| Mentions this run | 59 | 61 |
| Positive in AI answers | 60% | 28% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Apollo −2.799999999999997pp · Outreach −20.300000000000004pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Outreach leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
49 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Apollo | Outreach |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud platform | — |
| Integrations | 200+ | — |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2, CCPA, ISO/IEC 27001, CASA Tier 2, CPRA, EU-US DPF, PCI DSS | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, HIPAA, CSA STAR |
| Support | Email support at support@apollo.io, Dedicated support on Custom plans, Sales team for Custom plan discussions | Plus support included with Amplify Core, Managed services included with Amplify Pro, Technical account management and enterprise support, Professional services packages for onboarding |
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Seattle, Washington |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series D · $250M raised | Series G · $489M raised |
| Best for | Sales and go-to-market teams that run prospecting, outreach and dialing and want data, AI and execution in one system | Revenue teams, from SDRs and account executives to sales managers, RevOps and customer success, that want prospecting, deal management, coaching and forecasting in one platform. |
Plans side by side
Outreach
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Apollo
- Large B2B contact database combined with prospecting and email sequencing
- Transparent self-serve per-user pricing with a free tier
- Strong all-in-one value for prospecting and outreach
- Affordable, reliable choice for small teams and startups
- Widely used and highly rated by reviewers
Outreach
- Enterprise-grade, mature task-driven sequencing platform
- Deep workflow controls and granular sequence analytics
- Recognized as an enterprise leader by analysts
- Strong multi-channel sequencing, AI-guided selling and forecasting
- Quote-based pricing with no public prices
- Heavy and complex, slow to configure
- Annual contracts with minimum seat counts
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Apollo vs Outreach”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/apollo-vs-outreach, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.