ApplicantStackThe affordable, easy-to-use online applicant tracking system and employee onboarding system.
vs
TestGorillaFind great talent. Prove they can do the job.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
ApplicantStack vs TestGorilla
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
ApplicantStack is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 1.4 versus 0.6 for TestGorilla.
Choose ApplicantStack if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.4 vs 0.6)
- You want a lower entry price ($29.99 vs $74)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Budget-friendly entry-level pricing
Choose TestGorilla if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need GDPR compliant or SOC 2 Type II compliant coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- automated sending of tests and automatic score return
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | ApplicantStack | TestGorilla |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.4% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #49 | #59 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
ApplicantStack 0pp · TestGorilla 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
ApplicantStack leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ApplicantStackTestGorilla
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0ApplicantStack ranked higher
0TestGorilla ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | ApplicantStack | TestGorilla |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $29.99 / mo | Free; paid from $74 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Online, with no software installation required | — |
| Compliance | — | GDPR compliant, SOC 2 Type II compliant |
| Support | Support staff during standard business hours, Online help center, getting started guides and videos, Curated knowledge base | Help center, 24/7 live chat, Email support, Digital onboarding guides |
| Founded | — | 2020 |
| Headquarters | — | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| Employees | — | 201–500 |
| Funding | — | Series A · $80M raised |
| Best for | Small and mid-sized businesses, including start-ups and organizations with low-volume hiring needs | Small companies with limited hiring needs (Core plan) and larger teams screening candidates at scale (Plus plan). |
Plans side by side
ApplicantStack
Starter$29.99per month
Growth$49.99per month
Recruit$109.99per month
Bundle$159.99per month
TestGorilla
Gorilla Sourcing Free$0month
Gorilla Sourcing Core$74per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Sourcing Plus$134per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Assessments Free$0month
Gorilla Assessments Core$215per account per month, billed annually (from)
Gorilla Assessments Plus$520per account per month, billed annually (from)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
ApplicantStack
- Budget-friendly entry-level pricing
- Discounted annual prepayment option
TestGorilla
- automated sending of tests and automatic score return
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “ApplicantStack vs TestGorilla”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/applicantstack-vs-testgorilla, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.