Appsmith vs Make
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Appsmith is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 17.6 versus 6.3 for Make, and ranks ahead in 60% of the answers that name both.
Choose Appsmith if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.6 vs 6.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (48% vs 41% positive)
- Open-source and free to self-host
- Flexible approach with native JavaScript customization
Choose Make if…
- You need GDPR or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Appsmith | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.6% | 6.3% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.9% | down−7.8% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #7 | #16 |
| Share of voice | 4.2% | 2.3% |
| Mentions this run | 23 | 13 |
| Positive in AI answers | 48% | 41% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Appsmith +1.9000000000000021pp · Make −7.8pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Appsmith leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
5 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Appsmith | Make |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do companies build internal apps without a full engineering team without a dedicated tool? | ChatGPT | #5 | #7 |
| How do companies build internal apps without a full engineering team without a dedicated tool? | AI Mode | #2 | #7 |
| What are the best Low-Code & No-Code tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #19 | #7 |
| What are the best Low-Code & No-Code tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #15 | #13 |
| Is there a free low-code platform for small teams? | Perplexity | #2 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Appsmith | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted, cloud, or managed hosting; air-gapped edition as an add-on | Cloud, hosted on Amazon AWS |
| Integrations | — | 3500+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Community support on Discord, Priority email and chat support on Business, 24x7 support with response time SLAs on Enterprise, Dedicated customer solutions engineer on Enterprise | Help center, Community forum, 24/7 support on Enterprise plans, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2019 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Prague, Czech Republic |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series B · $52M raised | — |
| Best for | Developers and engineering teams building internal apps, dashboards and admin panels | Teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide. |
Plans side by side
Make
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Appsmith
- Open-source and free to self-host
- Flexible approach with native JavaScript customization
- Strong fit for internal tools, dashboards and admin panels
- Favored by developers and technical teams
- Transparent, predictable published pricing
Make
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
- Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
- Built-in AI agents for business workflows
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appsmith vs Make”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appsmith-vs-make, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.