AsanaWork & Project Management for Human-Agent Teams
vs
CapacitiesA studio for your mind
Comparison · Knowledge Management · weekly run Nov 3
Asana vs Capacities
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Asana is the stronger AI pick in Knowledge Management: it has a visibility score of 6.3 versus 2.2 for Capacities.
Choose Asana if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.3 vs 2.2)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or FedRAMP Moderate (Asana Gov) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Capacities if…
- You want a lower entry price ($9.99 vs $10.99)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Organizes information around real-world objects rather than flat files or folders
- Natural knowledge organization
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Asana | Capacities |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 6.3% | 2.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Knowledge Management | #16 | #31 |
| Share of voice | 1.4% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 7 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 42% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Asana 0pp · Capacities 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Asana leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AsanaCapacities
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Asana ranked higher
0Capacities ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Asana | Capacities |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $10.99 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $9.99 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud | Desktop, web and mobile apps |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, FedRAMP Moderate (Asana Gov) | — |
| Support | Help Center, Community, Asana Academy, Customer Success | Active Discord community, Email support, Priority support for Believer subscribers |
| Founded | 2008 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 1–10 |
| Funding | Series E | Accelerator-type deal (Media Lab Bayern) |
| Best for | Individuals and teams from small groups up to large organizations scaling cross-functional work across departments. | Individuals who think for a living, such as writers, researchers, students, developers and founders |
Plans side by side
Asana
Personal$0free forever
Starter$10.99per user per month, billed annually
Advanced$24.99per user per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Capacities
Capacities Basic$0free forever
Capacities Pro$9.99month
Capacities Believer$12.49month
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Asana
- Strong for cross-functional structured execution and milestone tracking
- Easy to adopt and use, with clean design
- Goal tracking and cross-team accountability
- Strongest general-purpose project management choice
- Asana Intelligence summarises status and spots bottlenecks; AI agents for coordination
Capacities
- Organizes information around real-world objects rather than flat files or folders
- Natural knowledge organization
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Asana vs Capacities”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/asana-vs-capacities, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.