Augment CodeAgentic software development at organizational scale
vs
ZedThe world's fastest IDE. Open source. AI optional.
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Augment Code vs Zed
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Augment Code is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 2.2 versus 1 for Zed.
Choose Augment Code if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.2 vs 1)
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 50% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 42001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
Choose Zed if…
- You want a free plan to start
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Ideal for small teams already on GitHub
- Works with VS Code and JetBrains
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Augment Code | Zed |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.2% | 1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #20 | #26 |
| Share of voice | 0.8% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Augment Code 0pp · Zed 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Augment Code leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Augment CodeZed
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Augment Code ranked higher
0Zed ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Augment Code | Zed |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $20 / mo | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Managed cloud sandboxes, your own machines, or pools of both | Desktop editor on Windows, macOS and Linux, with remote development over SSH, WSL and dev containers. Users can run local Ollama models, and API keys for hosted providers are kept on the local machine. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 42001 | — |
| Support | Community support and tickets via support portal (Standard, Business), Dedicated support with full SLA (Enterprise) | — |
| Founded | 2022 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, California, United States | Boulder, Colorado |
| Employees | 51–200 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series B · $252M raised | Series B · $42M raised |
| Best for | Enterprises and engineering organizations running agent workflows across the software development lifecycle, from startups to the Fortune 500 | Developers who want a fast editor with AI optional, and teams that need org-level control over AI features and data sharing through the Business plan. |
Plans side by side
Augment Code
Standard$20month flat, no per-seat charge
Business$100month flat, no per-seat charge
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Augment Code
- Suited to very large or legacy repositories
- Named as a contender in the field
Zed
- Ideal for small teams already on GitHub
- Works with VS Code and JetBrains
- Heavy usage requires a paid plan upgrade
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Augment Code vs Zed”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/augment-code-vs-zed, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.