AuthentikOpen source, self-hosted identity provider for unified authentication.
vs
CyberArkUnified IAM, PAM, and IGA identity security platform.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
Authentik vs CyberArk
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
CyberArk is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 15.6 versus 2.7 for Authentik.
Choose Authentik if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 49% positive)
- You need OpenID Certified coverage
- fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
- modern UI
Choose CyberArk if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15.6 vs 2.7)
- You need SOC 2 or SOC 3 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or ISO 9001:2015 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO 22301 or CSA STAR or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or FedRAMP High or Common Criteria or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or HIPAA or IRAP or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Authentik | CyberArk |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.7% | 15.6% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.7% | up+2.1% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #24 | #7 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 6.1% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 19 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 49% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Authentik +1.0000000000000002pp · CyberArk +0.5pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
CyberArk leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AuthentikCyberArk
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Authentik ranked higher
0CyberArk ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Authentik | CyberArk |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted (Kubernetes, Terraform, Docker Compose, AWS CloudFormation); no hosted version offered | Self-hosted and SaaS |
| Compliance | OpenID Certified | SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO 22301, CSA STAR, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, FedRAMP High, Common Criteria, PCI DSS v4.0.1, HIPAA, IRAP, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | Community Discord, GitHub community support, Ticket-based support (Enterprise over $1k), Dedicated support with SLAs (Enterprise Plus) | Support contact, Knowledge base, Technical community |
| Founded | 2018 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | — | Newton, MA, United States |
| Employees | 1–10 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Later-stage VC · $2M raised | Post-IPO debt |
| Best for | Organizations that want to self-host their identity provider and keep control of their identity data, from homelabs to enterprises with thousands of users. | Enterprises that need to secure privileged access for human and machine identities. |
Plans side by side
Authentik
Open Source$0free
Enterprise$5user / month, billed annually
Enterprise Plus$20,000year (starting at)
CyberArk
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Authentik
- fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
- modern UI
- easy to administer
- affordable, reliable, secure IAM platform for business use
- highly flexible with built-in MFA and proxy outposts
- you must manage hosting, updates, backups, and security yourself
CyberArk
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
- Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation
- Security-first approach with strong behavioral analytics
- Bridges standard access management with robust PAM and machine identity security
- Strong for enterprises combining workforce identity with PAM
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Authentik vs CyberArk”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/authentik-vs-cyberark, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.