Authentik vs Keeper Security
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Authentik is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 2.7 versus 0.5 for Keeper Security.
Choose Authentik if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.7 vs 0.5)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 0% positive)
- You need OpenID Certified coverage
Choose Keeper Security if…
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 or FedRAMP High or GovRAMP High or FIPS 140-3 or PCI DSS Level 1 or HIPAA or GDPR or FDA 21 CFR Part 11 or TRUSTe coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Authentik | Keeper Security |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.7% | 0.5% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.7% | down−0.1% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #24 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Authentik +1.0000000000000002pp · Keeper Security −0.19999999999999996pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Authentik leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Authentik | Keeper Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Self-hosted (Kubernetes, Terraform, Docker Compose, AWS CloudFormation); no hosted version offered | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Compliance | OpenID Certified | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, FedRAMP High, GovRAMP High, FIPS 140-3, PCI DSS Level 1, HIPAA, GDPR, FDA 21 CFR Part 11, TRUSTe |
| Support | Community Discord, GitHub community support, Ticket-based support (Enterprise over $1k), Dedicated support with SLAs (Enterprise Plus) | Phone support, Live chat, Documentation, Keeper University |
| Founded | 2018 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | — | Chicago, Illinois, United States |
| Employees | 1–10 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Later-stage VC · $2M raised | Minority growth equity (Summit Partners) · $60M raised |
| Best for | Organizations that want to self-host their identity provider and keep control of their identity data, from homelabs to enterprises with thousands of users. | Organizations wanting password, secrets and privileged access management in one zero-knowledge cloud platform |
Plans side by side
Authentik
Keeper Security
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Authentik
- fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
- modern UI
- easy to administer
- affordable, reliable, secure IAM platform for business use
- highly flexible with built-in MFA and proxy outposts
- you must manage hosting, updates, backups, and security yourself
Keeper Security
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Authentik vs Keeper Security”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/authentik-vs-keeper-security, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.