Skip to content
SlateIndex
Microsoft Entra IDMicrosoft's cloud identity and access management service
vs
OktaSecuring every identity, from AI to human
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3

Microsoft Entra ID vs Okta

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Microsoft Entra ID is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 66 versus 56.9 for Okta, and ranks ahead in 64% of the answers that name both.

Choose Microsoft Entra ID if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (66 vs 56.9)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (45% vs 39% positive)
  • Native integration with Microsoft 365 and Azure ecosystems
  • Cost-effective fit for organizations already paying for Microsoft 365

Choose Okta if…

  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP High or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage
  • Market-leading IAM platform
  • Independent, cloud-native identity platform
  • Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Microsoft Entra ID Okta
Visibility score66%56.9%
Change vs last weekup+5.2%down−0.9%
Rank in Identity & Access Management#1#2
Share of voice12.9%12.2%
Mentions this run4038
Positive in AI answers45%39%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Microsoft Entra ID 66%

Microsoft Entra ID +5.100000000000001pp · Okta −3.3000000000000043pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Microsoft Entra ID leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
80.5%
68.4%
AI Mode
68.9%
60%
Perplexity
63.1%
53.9%
Microsoft Entra IDOkta

Head to head in AI answers

58 engine answers name both brands

37Microsoft Entra ID ranked higher
21Okta ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionMicrosoft Entra IDOkta
Pricing model—Per seat
Entry price—$6 per seat / mo
Free plan—No · 30-day trial
DeploymentCloudCloud (SaaS)
Integrations—8000+
Compliance—ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4
Support—Online support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success Plans
Founded20082009
Headquarters—San Francisco, California, United States
Employees—5,000+
Funding—IPO
Best for—Organizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform.

Plans side by side

Microsoft Entra ID

Pricing not available.

Okta

Starter$6user/month, billed annually
Core Essentials$14user/month, billed annually
Essentials$17user/month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustomuser/month
EnterpriseCustomuser/month
Okta pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Microsoft Entra ID

  • Native integration with Microsoft 365 and Azure ecosystems
  • Cost-effective fit for organizations already paying for Microsoft 365
  • Strong workforce IAM with SSO, MFA and passwordless access
  • Top-ranked and recognised as a Leader among IAM providers
  • Strong for enterprise identity governance and hybrid environments
  • Advanced add-ons carry extra yearly paid subscription costs
  • Advanced features such as Conditional Access require paid tiers

Okta

  • Market-leading IAM platform
  • Independent, cloud-native identity platform
  • Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
  • Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
  • Strong security effectiveness

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Microsoft Entra ID vs Okta”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/microsoft-entra-id-vs-okta, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.