Microsoft Entra ID vs Okta
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Microsoft Entra ID is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 66 versus 56.9 for Okta, and ranks ahead in 64% of the answers that name both.
Choose Microsoft Entra ID if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (66 vs 56.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (45% vs 39% positive)
- Native integration with Microsoft 365 and Azure ecosystems
- Cost-effective fit for organizations already paying for Microsoft 365
Choose Okta if…
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP High or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage
- Market-leading IAM platform
- Independent, cloud-native identity platform
- Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Microsoft Entra ID | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 66% | 56.9% |
| Change vs last week | up+5.2% | down−0.9% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #1 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 12.9% | 12.2% |
| Mentions this run | 40 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | 45% | 39% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Microsoft Entra ID +5.100000000000001pp · Okta −3.3000000000000043pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Microsoft Entra ID leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
58 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Microsoft Entra ID | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $6 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 8000+ |
| Compliance | — | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4 |
| Support | — | Online support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success Plans |
| Founded | 2008 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | — | 5,000+ |
| Funding | — | IPO |
| Best for | — | Organizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform. |
Plans side by side
Microsoft Entra ID
Pricing not available.
Okta
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Microsoft Entra ID
- Native integration with Microsoft 365 and Azure ecosystems
- Cost-effective fit for organizations already paying for Microsoft 365
- Strong workforce IAM with SSO, MFA and passwordless access
- Top-ranked and recognised as a Leader among IAM providers
- Strong for enterprise identity governance and hybrid environments
- Advanced add-ons carry extra yearly paid subscription costs
- Advanced features such as Conditional Access require paid tiers
Okta
- Market-leading IAM platform
- Independent, cloud-native identity platform
- Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
- Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
- Strong security effectiveness
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Microsoft Entra ID vs Okta”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/microsoft-entra-id-vs-okta, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.