AuthentikOpen source, self-hosted identity provider for unified authentication.
vs
OmadaA Leader In Identity Governance and Administration
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
Authentik vs Omada
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Authentik is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 2.7 versus 0.6 for Omada.
Choose Authentik if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.7 vs 0.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 0% positive)
- You need OpenID Certified coverage
- fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
Choose Omada if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Authentik | Omada |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.7% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.7% | up+0.6% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #24 | #34 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Authentik +1.0000000000000002pp · Omada 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Authentik leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AuthentikOmada
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Authentik ranked higher
0Omada ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Authentik | Omada |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted (Kubernetes, Terraform, Docker Compose, AWS CloudFormation); no hosted version offered | SaaS on Microsoft Azure (EU or US region), private tenant, or on-premises |
| Compliance | OpenID Certified | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 |
| Support | Community Discord, GitHub community support, Ticket-based support (Enterprise over $1k), Dedicated support with SLAs (Enterprise Plus) | Customer Success Team, Service Desk, ITSM system access, Professional services |
| Founded | 2018 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | — | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| Employees | 1–10 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Later-stage VC · $2M raised | Majority investment (GRO and Kirk Kapital) |
| Best for | Organizations that want to self-host their identity provider and keep control of their identity data, from homelabs to enterprises with thousands of users. | Regulated enterprises and government organizations that need identity governance and administration |
Plans side by side
Authentik
Open Source$0free
Enterprise$5user / month, billed annually
Enterprise Plus$20,000year (starting at)
Omada
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Authentik
- fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
- modern UI
- easy to administer
- affordable, reliable, secure IAM platform for business use
- highly flexible with built-in MFA and proxy outposts
- you must manage hosting, updates, backups, and security yourself
Omada
- Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
- Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Authentik vs Omada”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/authentik-vs-omada, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.