Skip to content
SlateIndex
AuthentikOpen source, self-hosted identity provider for unified authentication.
vs
WorkOSYour app, Enterprise Ready.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3

Authentik vs WorkOS

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

WorkOS is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 9.5 versus 2.7 for Authentik.

Choose Authentik if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 56% positive)
  • You need OpenID Certified coverage
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
  • fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform

Choose WorkOS if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (9.5 vs 2.7)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR or CCPA or SOC 3 or SIG Lite coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
  • Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Authentik WorkOS
Visibility score2.7%9.5%
Change vs last weekup+1.7%down−1.3%
Rank in Identity & Access Management#24#11
Share of voice0.6%3%
Mentions this run210
Positive in AI answers67%56%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Authentik 3%

Authentik +1.0000000000000002pp · WorkOS +0.5999999999999996pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

WorkOS leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
7.7%
4.5%
AI Mode
3.7%
6.3%
Perplexity
1.7%
12.8%
AuthentikWorkOS

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Authentik ranked higher
0WorkOS ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAuthentikWorkOS
Pricing modelPer seatUsage-based
Entry priceFree; paid from $5 per seat / moContact sales
Free planYesYes
DeploymentSelf-hosted (Kubernetes, Terraform, Docker Compose, AWS CloudFormation); no hosted version offeredCloud APIs and SDKs
Integrations—20+
ComplianceOpenID CertifiedSOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, SOC 3, SIG Lite
SupportCommunity Discord, GitHub community support, Ticket-based support (Enterprise over $1k), Dedicated support with SLAs (Enterprise Plus)Email support, In-dashboard web support, Slack channel, Video calls
Founded20182019
Headquarters—San Francisco, California, United States
Employees1–1051–200
FundingLater-stage VC · $2M raisedSeed · $195M raised
Best forOrganizations that want to self-host their identity provider and keep control of their identity data, from homelabs to enterprises with thousands of users.SaaS and AI companies that need to add enterprise features like SSO and SCIM to sell to large organizations.

Plans side by side

Authentik

Open Source$0free
Enterprise$5user / month, billed annually
Enterprise Plus$20,000year (starting at)
Authentik pricing

WorkOS

Pay as you go$0month, usage-based
Annual CreditsCustomcontact sales
WorkOS pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Authentik

  • fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
  • modern UI
  • easy to administer
  • affordable, reliable, secure IAM platform for business use
  • highly flexible with built-in MFA and proxy outposts
  • you must manage hosting, updates, backups, and security yourself

WorkOS

  • Highly transparent for B2B SaaS authentication
  • Best overall choice for typical B2B SaaS authentication
  • Purpose-built for B2B SaaS to quickly unlock enterprise contracts
  • Generous free tier and usage-based pricing
  • Rapid enterprise feature integration (SSO, SCIM, provisioning)
  • Advanced enterprise SAML connections may incur extra costs

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Authentik vs WorkOS”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/authentik-vs-workos, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.