AutoRFP.ai vs Proposify
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Proposify is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 41.4 versus 0.3 for AutoRFP.ai, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose AutoRFP.ai if…
- You need ISO 27001:2022 certified or SOC 2 Type II audited or GDPR compliant or UK GDPR compliant or CCPA compliant or EU Cloud Code of Conduct coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Listed among G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations
Choose Proposify if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (41.4 vs 0.3)
- You want a lower entry price ($49 vs $899)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | AutoRFP.ai | Proposify |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 41.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #42 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 9.4% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 49 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 49% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AutoRFP.ai 0pp · Proposify 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Proposify leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | AutoRFP.ai | Proposify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #16 | #12 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AutoRFP.ai | Proposify |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | $899 / mo | $49 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud on AWS, hosted in the US (Oregon), EU (Frankfurt) or Australia (Sydney), depending on customer needs. | Cloud-hosted SaaS |
| Integrations | 34+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO 27001:2022 certified, SOC 2 Type II audited, GDPR compliant, UK GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant, EU Cloud Code of Conduct | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR |
| Support | Unlimited support on all plans, Online training included, White-glove onboarding, with previous responses imported within 48 hours, Security questions handled at security@autorfp.ai | Email and chat support, Phone and Zoom support, Dedicated success manager on Scale plan, Priority support |
| Founded | 2022 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Brisbane, Queensland, Australia | Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Growth Equity - II (CB Insights) |
| Best for | Bid and sales teams that answer high volumes of RFPs, DDQs and security questionnaires, from startups to Fortune 500 companies. | Busy sales teams that send proposals and quotes, such as consultants and service firms in landscaping, janitorial and construction. |
Plans side by side
AutoRFP.ai
Proposify
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AutoRFP.ai
- Listed among G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations
Proposify
- Visually rich, branded proposal design
- Robust tracking and granular proposal analytics
- Well-regarded with strong user satisfaction
- Quotes and contracts with built-in approval workflows
- Discounted annual pricing lowers effective per-user cost
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AutoRFP.ai vs Proposify”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/autorfp-ai-vs-proposify, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.