Skip to content
SlateIndex
AutoRFP.aiThe agentic AI RFP Software built to win deals, not just respond faster.
vs
ProposifyProposal software that gives you control and insight into the close.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

AutoRFP.ai vs Proposify

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Proposify is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 41.4 versus 0.3 for AutoRFP.ai, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose AutoRFP.ai if…

  • You need ISO 27001:2022 certified or SOC 2 Type II audited or GDPR compliant or UK GDPR compliant or CCPA compliant or EU Cloud Code of Conduct coverage
  • Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
  • Listed among G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations

Choose Proposify if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (41.4 vs 0.3)
  • You want a lower entry price ($49 vs $899)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric AutoRFP.ai Proposify
Visibility score0.3%41.4%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#42#2
Share of voice0.2%9.4%
Mentions this run149
Positive in AI answers—49%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2AutoRFP.ai 0%

AutoRFP.ai 0pp · Proposify 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Proposify leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0.9%
50.9%
AI Mode
0%
39.3%
Perplexity
0%
33.9%
AutoRFP.aiProposify

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

0AutoRFP.ai ranked higher
1Proposify ranked higher
PromptEngineAutoRFP.aiProposify
Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? ChatGPT#16#12

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAutoRFP.aiProposify
Pricing modelUsage-basedPer seat
Entry price$899 / mo$49 per seat / mo
Free planNoNo · 14-day trial
DeploymentCloud on AWS, hosted in the US (Oregon), EU (Frankfurt) or Australia (Sydney), depending on customer needs.Cloud-hosted SaaS
Integrations34+—
ComplianceISO 27001:2022 certified, SOC 2 Type II audited, GDPR compliant, UK GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant, EU Cloud Code of ConductSOC 2 Type 2, GDPR
SupportUnlimited support on all plans, Online training included, White-glove onboarding, with previous responses imported within 48 hours, Security questions handled at security@autorfp.aiEmail and chat support, Phone and Zoom support, Dedicated success manager on Scale plan, Priority support
Founded20222013
HeadquartersBrisbane, Queensland, AustraliaHalifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Employees11–5051–200
FundingBootstrappedGrowth Equity - II (CB Insights)
Best forBid and sales teams that answer high volumes of RFPs, DDQs and security questionnaires, from startups to Fortune 500 companies.Busy sales teams that send proposals and quotes, such as consultants and service firms in landscaping, janitorial and construction.

Plans side by side

AutoRFP.ai

Scale$899month, paid yearly
Accelerate$1,299month, paid yearly
EnterpriseCustomcustom
AutoRFP.ai pricing

Proposify

Build$49user/month (monthly); $39/user/mo billed annually ($468/user/year)
Grow$65user/month, billed annually ($780/user/year)
Scale$12,800year platform fee, includes 10 users; extra users $780/user/year
Proposify pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

AutoRFP.ai

  • Listed among G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations

    Proposify

    • Visually rich, branded proposal design
    • Robust tracking and granular proposal analytics
    • Well-regarded with strong user satisfaction
    • Quotes and contracts with built-in approval workflows
    • Discounted annual pricing lowers effective per-user cost

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “AutoRFP.ai vs Proposify”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/autorfp-ai-vs-proposify, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.