Skip to content
SlateIndex
AvomaAI Platform for Note-taking, Scheduling & Coaching
vs
MindtickleYour AI teammate for every deal
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2

Avoma vs Mindtickle

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Mindtickle is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 32.4 versus 0.4 for Avoma.

Choose Avoma if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or HIPAA (Enterprise plan) coverage
  • free view-only and collaborator seats

Choose Mindtickle if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (32.4 vs 0.4)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 25% positive)
  • You need ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 27017:2015 or ISO 27018:2019 or ISO 22301:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or SOC 2 or HIPAA or 21 CFR Part 11 or CSA STAR Level 1 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Avoma Mindtickle
Visibility score0.4%32.4%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Sales Enablement#39#5
Share of voice0.2%8%
Mentions this run145
Positive in AI answers25%51%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Avoma 0%

Avoma 0pp · Mindtickle 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Mindtickle leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.3%
31.1%
AI Mode
0%
30.9%
Perplexity
0%
35.2%
AvomaMindtickle

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Avoma ranked higher
0Mindtickle ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAvomaMindtickle
Pricing modelPer seat—
Entry price$19 per seat / mo—
Free planNo · 14-day trial—
DeploymentCloud-hosted on AWS in the USA—
Integrations—100+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, GDPR, HIPAA (Enterprise plan)ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 27017:2015, ISO 27018:2019, ISO 22301:2019, ISO 42001:2023, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, 21 CFR Part 11, CSA STAR Level 1
SupportSelf-service knowledge base, Live chat and email support, Customer Success Manager, Shared Slack channelProfessional services, Success specialists
Founded20172012
HeadquartersPalo Alto, California, USSan Francisco, California
Employees51–200501–1,000
FundingSeries A · $15M raisedUndisclosed round · $281M raised
Best forCustomer-facing sales, success and marketing teams at startups and scaleupsMid-market and enterprise sales teams

Plans side by side

Avoma

Startup$19recorder seat/month, billed annually ($29 billed monthly)
Organization$29recorder seat/month, billed annually ($39 billed monthly)
Enterprise$39recorder seat/month, billed annually only
Avoma pricing

Mindtickle

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Avoma

  • free view-only and collaborator seats
  • per-seat pricing for recorder seats

Mindtickle

  • Strong sales readiness, onboarding, and certification focus
  • Effective coaching and skills development
  • AI role-play and video coaching
  • High user ratings on G2
  • Free starting tier
  • Opaque, custom pricing behind contact-sales forms
  • Needs a sizable team, content volume, and budget to implement

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Avoma vs Mindtickle”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/avoma-vs-mindtickle, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.