AvomaAI Platform for Note-taking, Scheduling & Coaching
vs
HubSpotThe agentic customer platform to scale your business.
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Avoma vs HubSpot
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
HubSpot is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 39.1 versus 0.4 for Avoma, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Avoma if…
- You need ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or GDPR or HIPAA (Enterprise plan) coverage
- free view-only and collaborator seats
Choose HubSpot if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (39.1 vs 0.4)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (35% vs 25% positive)
- You need SOC 3 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Avoma | HubSpot |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.4% | 39.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #39 | #3 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 9.8% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 54 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | 35% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Avoma 0pp · HubSpot 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
HubSpot leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AvomaHubSpot
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Avoma ranked higher
1HubSpot ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Avoma | HubSpot |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should a sales enablement platform integrate with? | ChatGPT | #6 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Avoma | HubSpot |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $19 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $7 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | Yes |
| Onboarding fee | — | $3,000 |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted on AWS in the USA | Cloud |
| Integrations | — | 2000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, GDPR, HIPAA (Enterprise plan) | SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | Self-service knowledge base, Live chat and email support, Customer Success Manager, Shared Slack channel | Phone |
| Founded | 2017 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, California, US | Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Series A · $15M raised | Corporate round |
| Best for | Customer-facing sales, success and marketing teams at startups and scaleups | Startups, small and mid-sized businesses and enterprises wanting marketing, sales and service on one CRM. |
Plans side by side
Avoma
Startup$19recorder seat/month, billed annually ($29 billed monthly)
Organization$29recorder seat/month, billed annually ($39 billed monthly)
Enterprise$39recorder seat/month, billed annually only
HubSpot
Free$0month
Starter$7month per seat (promotional, new customers; $20/mo/seat standard)
Professional$800month, includes 3 Core Seats (annual commitment; $890/mo)
Enterprise$3,600month, includes 5 Core Seats
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Avoma
- free view-only and collaborator seats
- per-seat pricing for recorder seats
HubSpot
- intuitive, user-friendly interface
- generous free tier
- all-in-one CRM and marketing platform
- tight CRM integration for live chat and service
- good fit for startups and small businesses
- higher-tier costs and onboarding fees
- higher month-to-month pricing than annual plans
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Avoma vs HubSpot”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/avoma-vs-hubspot, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.