AvomaAI Platform for Note-taking, Scheduling & Coaching
vs
QuantifiedAI Sales Coaching & Roleplay That Wins
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Avoma vs Quantified
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Quantified is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 1.2 versus 0.4 for Avoma.
Choose Avoma if…
- You need ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or GDPR or HIPAA (Enterprise plan) coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- free view-only and collaborator seats
Choose Quantified if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.2 vs 0.4)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Avoma | Quantified |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.4% | 1.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #39 | #31 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Avoma 0pp · Quantified 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Quantified leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AvomaQuantified
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Avoma ranked higher
0Quantified ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Avoma | Quantified |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $19 per seat / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted on AWS in the USA | Cloud-hosted on AWS in US East (Ohio) or Europe (Frankfurt), with a logically isolated tenant for each customer |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, GDPR, HIPAA (Enterprise plan) | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Self-service knowledge base, Live chat and email support, Customer Success Manager, Shared Slack channel | Team builds personas, scenarios and rubrics alongside the customer's team, Calibration of scoring with the customer's trainers, Hands-on help during rollout and a success team after launch, Email help@quantified.ai |
| Founded | 2017 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, California, US | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series A · $15M raised | Seed |
| Best for | Customer-facing sales, success and marketing teams at startups and scaleups | Life sciences and regulated commercial teams that must certify reps and keep messaging on-label, such as pharma launch and training teams |
Plans side by side
Avoma
Startup$19recorder seat/month, billed annually ($29 billed monthly)
Organization$29recorder seat/month, billed annually ($39 billed monthly)
Enterprise$39recorder seat/month, billed annually only
Quantified
Base (Quantified AI Roleplay)Customquoted per team and program
Standard (Quantified AI Sales Coaching Platform)Customquoted per team and program
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Avoma
- free view-only and collaborator seats
- per-seat pricing for recorder seats
Quantified
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Avoma vs Quantified”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/avoma-vs-quantified, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.