AvomaAI Platform for Note-taking, Scheduling & Coaching
vs
tl;dvThe AI Notetaker built for Team Collaboration
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Avoma vs tl;dv
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
tl;dv is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 2.8 versus 0.4 for Avoma.
Choose Avoma if…
- You need ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or HIPAA (Enterprise plan) coverage
- free view-only and collaborator seats
Choose tl;dv if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.8 vs 0.4)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 25% positive)
- You need EU AI Act coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Avoma | tl;dv |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.4% | 2.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #39 | #24 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Avoma 0pp · tl;dv 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
tl;dv leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Avomatl;dv
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Avoma ranked higher
0tl;dv ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Avoma | tl;dv |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $19 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $18 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted on AWS in the USA | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | — | 5000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, GDPR, HIPAA (Enterprise plan) | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EU AI Act |
| Support | Self-service knowledge base, Live chat and email support, Customer Success Manager, Shared Slack channel | AI-supported chat and self-serve help center, Email and chat support, Priority customer support, Dedicated Success Manager on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2017 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, California, US | Aachen, Germany |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series A · $15M raised | Seed (€4.3M, led by K Fund) |
| Best for | Customer-facing sales, success and marketing teams at startups and scaleups | Sales, customer success and internal teams that want meeting notes and CRM updates automated |
Plans side by side
Avoma
Startup$19recorder seat/month, billed annually ($29 billed monthly)
Organization$29recorder seat/month, billed annually ($39 billed monthly)
Enterprise$39recorder seat/month, billed annually only
tl;dv
Free$0forever
Pro$18per seat/month, billed annually
Business$29per seat/month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Avoma
- free view-only and collaborator seats
- per-seat pricing for recorder seats
tl;dv
- robust free plan for recording and transcribing calls
- AI summaries of Zoom and Google Meet sales calls
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Avoma vs tl;dv”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/avoma-vs-tl-dv, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.