AWS IAM vs Keycloak
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Keycloak is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 5.6 versus 5.1 for AWS IAM, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose AWS IAM if…
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 or ISO 9001 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or FedRAMP or DoD SRG or PCI DSS Level 1 coverage
- Well suited to infrastructure centered on AWS
- Free core federation and multi-account management
- Ranked second overall by ISG
Choose Keycloak if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.6 vs 5.1)
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
- Top pick as a self-hosted option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | AWS IAM | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.1% | 5.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | down−0.3% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #19 | #15 |
| Share of voice | 1.6% | 2.1% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 7 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AWS IAM +5.1pp · Keycloak −0.7000000000000002pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Keycloak leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | AWS IAM | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Identity & Access Management tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #7 | #8 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AWS IAM | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | — | Self-hosted; ships as a single lightweight container image, with clustering for scalability and availability |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 9001, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, FedRAMP, DoD SRG, PCI DSS Level 1 | — |
| Support | — | Community support via GitHub Discussions, Commercial support via Red Hat build of Keycloak |
| Founded | — | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, Washington | — |
| Employees | 5,000+ | — |
| Best for | — | Teams that want to self-host standards-based single sign-on and identity brokering for their applications |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AWS IAM
- Well suited to infrastructure centered on AWS
- Free core federation and multi-account management
- Ranked second overall by ISG
- Listed among strong identity platforms for 2026
Keycloak
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
- Top pick as a self-hosted option
- Backed by Red Hat and community; popular open-source IAM tool
- Supports SAML, OAuth 2.0, and OpenID Connect
- Team must handle hosting, upgrades, backups, and security
- Less operational simplicity than managed alternatives
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AWS IAM vs Keycloak”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/aws-iam-vs-keycloak, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.