AWS IAM vs Okta
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Okta is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 56.9 versus 5.1 for AWS IAM, and ranks ahead in 75% of the answers that name both.
Choose AWS IAM if…
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 or ISO 9001 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or FedRAMP or DoD SRG or PCI DSS Level 1 coverage
- Well suited to infrastructure centered on AWS
- Free core federation and multi-account management
- Ranked second overall by ISG
Choose Okta if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56.9 vs 5.1)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP High or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage
- Market-leading IAM platform
- Independent, cloud-native identity platform
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | AWS IAM | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.1% | 56.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | down−0.9% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #19 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 1.6% | 12.2% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 39% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AWS IAM +5.1pp · Okta −3.3000000000000043pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Okta leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | AWS IAM | Okta |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Identity & Access Management tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #7 | #2 |
| Compare the leading Identity & Access Management platforms | Perplexity | #9 | #2 |
| Which Identity & Access Management vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #2 | #4 |
| Where can I sign up for a identity and access management platform? | AI Mode | #6 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AWS IAM | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $6 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 8000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 9001, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, FedRAMP, DoD SRG, PCI DSS Level 1 | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4 |
| Support | — | Online support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success Plans |
| Founded | — | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, Washington | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 5,000+ |
| Funding | — | IPO |
| Best for | — | Organizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform. |
Plans side by side
AWS IAM
Pricing not available.
Okta
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AWS IAM
- Well suited to infrastructure centered on AWS
- Free core federation and multi-account management
- Ranked second overall by ISG
- Listed among strong identity platforms for 2026
Okta
- Market-leading IAM platform
- Independent, cloud-native identity platform
- Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
- Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
- Strong security effectiveness
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AWS IAM vs Okta”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/aws-iam-vs-okta, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.